Wi-Fi router for home: selection criteria. Which Wi-Fi router is better to buy for a home or apartment? Choosing a router Which wifi router to choose for your home

Almost all home broadband Internet providers provide their own router when setting up the Internet. But there are several reasons to buy a newer and more powerful model.

Your router may have been sitting in a warehouse for a long time, or providers are intentionally purchasing older equipment because it is cheaper. This means it may not have the latest software or support the latest wireless networking standards, such as 802.11ac, which can provide faster data transfer speeds and a wider range of reception, thanks to directional transmission of waves, meaning faster downloads files and page browsing.

Most new laptops, tablets and smartphones now support 802.11ac, so if you're still using a five-year-old Wi-Fi router, you're missing out on a huge opportunity to speed up your internet connection.

You may also be interested in other recent advancements in routers and routers. Most wifi routers come with powerful software that makes managing your home network much easier. For example, you can create parental control rules or simply perform network maintenance activities. They also come with USB ports for use as NAS storage, and allow you to share the printer with every device in your home.

If you are thinking about upgrading your router, this article contains the best Wifi routers for home 2016. We will limit our list to ten items. You can already purchase each of these models.

1. AVM Fritz! Box 3490

Speed: ADSL/VDSL, 1300 Mbps 802.11ac, 450 Mbps 802.11n

Possibilities:

• 4 LAN Gigabit Ethernet ports
• 1 WAN Gigabit Ethernet port
• 2 USB 3.0 ports

Price: $150

Fritz router! The Box 3490 from the German company ABM is known for its power, reliability and excellent software for setting up your network and connecting to the Internet.

The 3490 supports cordless phones and landline lines. Unlike previous releases, this one is even more affordable and has even better performance and even more useful features.

The router has a built-in VDSL modem, so the router works both with an Ethernet cable and via the DSL protocol. The 802.11ac wireless protocol is also supported, with speeds up to 1300 Mbps. Using USB ports, you can turn your router into an excellent storage device with access to it from any device on the local network and control via NAS.

2. Asus RT-AC87U

Speed: 1733 Mbps 802.11ac, 600 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 3.0 and 1 x USB 2.0 port.

Price: $151

The second router on the list is the best wifi routers. While it's not the most affordable router on the market, it's one of the best because it offers a 4x4 implementation of the 802.11ac protocol for the fastest wireless speeds, with the potential for record-breaking performance.

In tests, it was one of the best wifi routers in terms of speed. It supports speeds of up to 600 Mbps over 802.11c when operating at 5.0 GHz. Of course, this also depends on your client adapter.

But what makes the RT-AC87U truly special is the software. It is easy to use and has enough features for both beginners and professionals with varying degrees of networking knowledge. Among the many functions, we can note the QoS system (quality of service control), parental controls, which are essentially nothing next to the download manager and cloud backup. In addition, which is important for Linux users, this router is compatible with DD-wrt firmware.

3. Linksys XAC1900

Speed: ADSL 1300 Mbps 802.11ac, 600 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN ports, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0 port

Price: $180

The Linksys XAC1900 has perhaps the simplest software and setup process of all the routers reviewed. But it's still full of interesting features. It is possible to control the router remotely, so you can connect to your home network from anywhere in the world.

XAC1900 comes with a DSL modem and a built-in power supply. Wifi performance, as in other routers reviewed, is excellent. It is possible to work in two bands - 4.2 and 5.0 GHz with a speed of 1300 Mbit / s 802.11ac and other, older standards are supported: 802.11n / G / B / a. The ports are, as usual, four Ethernet ports for the local network and one WAN port.

4. TP-Link Archer D9

Speed: 1300 Mbps 802.11ac, 600 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 3.0 port

Peculiarities: DD-WRT support

Price: 159.89

The best TP-Link routers are the most affordable for the general population. They provide an easy upgrade method and good wifi speeds at a reasonable price. Archer D9, unfortunately, is not as affordable as its predecessors, but in addition to ultra-fast Wifi using 802.11ac technology, it supports several additional functions that make this model one of TP-Link’s flagships.

Archer B9 comes with a built-in ADSL modem, which means you can connect it directly to your phone line, replacing any hardware supplied by your ISP. There is also a USB port on the rear panel for organizing NAS storage or connecting a printer.

It supports 3x3 802.11ac wireless connectivity with speeds up to 1300 Mbps and 600 Mbps for 802.11n. He performed well in tests, especially over long distances. This will be the best router for your home or garden. The software could be better, but there are enough features and support for DD-WRT. Overall, this is a router that works just well and is stable.

5. Buffalo AirStation Extreme AC1900

Speed: 1300 Mbps 802.11ac, 600 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0 port

Peculiarities: DD-wrt support

Price: 139,20

The Buffalo AirStation with three antennas was the best wifi router a few years ago. It provides 802.11ac Wifi speeds and also has TurboQAM support. Both frequencies are supported with the possibility of simultaneous operation on both 2.4 and 5.0 GHz channels. There are USB 2.0 and 3.0 ports, as well as four standard ports for organizing a local network and one WAN.

The software allows you to configure web filtering and parental controls, uses data from Symantec antivirus experts and a quality of service (QoS) system.

6. Trendnet TEW-818DRU

Speed: 867 Mbps 802.11ac, 300 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 3.0, 1 x USB 2.0 ports

Possibilities: dd-wrt support

Price: 148

The best book-shaped Wi-Fi router TEW-818DRU offers excellent WiFi performance. Of course, a little lower than the others 867 Mbps 802.11ac and 300 Mbps 802.11n. There's the usual array of Ethernet ports and USB 2.0 and 3.0 ports and a button to turn off the power.

It is very easy to set up and install and has several additional features. Among them are QoS and dynamic DNS settings. Another advantage is that if you don't like the Trendnet software you can install the open source Linux based firmware - dd-wrt.

7. Belkin AC1200DB Wi-Fi Dual-Band AC+ Gigabit

Excellent price/performance ratio

Speed: 867 Mbps 802.11ac, 300 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 2 x USB 3.0 ports

If you've been put off by the high prices of the best wifi routers with 802.11ac support, the AC1200DB, a more affordable router from Belkin, may be just what you need. It supports 2x2 MIMO 802.11ac wireless communication at a speed of 867 Mbps, currently most adapters in laptops and smartphones support this speed.

In all other respects, this is an excellent router, and it supports the old 2.4 and 5.0 802.11n/g/b/a standards well. There are also a pair of USB ports on the rear panel for storing data and sharing the printer. Unless you're chasing the fastest networks, you're unlikely to be disappointed. This is the best Wi-Fi router for those who want maximum performance for little money.

8. Netgear R7500 Nighthawk X4

Speed: 1733 Mbps 802.11ac, 600 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 4 x Gigabit Ethernet LAN, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 2 x USB 3.0 ports, 1 x ESATA port

A router in the form of a stealth fighter, the company's flagship Nighthawk X4 Netgear is one of the most powerful routers at the same time, we can say that this is the best router of 2016 in terms of wifi speed. Like the Asus RT-AC87U it has 4 antennas, so it supports 1733 Mbps with 4 x 4 MIMO 802.11ac technology. This ensures maximum performance. But to use these speeds, you need a compatible wireless adapter.

In addition, this router has support for external storage; there are not only two USB 3.0 ports, but also a port for connecting an ESATA hard drive. Although the software doesn't look very modern like other routers, there are a lot of useful features here. This is a solid networking product.

9. D-Link DIR-890-L Wireless AC3200

Speed: increased to 3200Mbps (600N at 2.4 GHz + 1300 Mbps + 1300 Mbps at 5GHz

Possibilities:

• 4 x LAN ports for local network
• 1 x WAN port
• 2 x USB 3.0 ports
• dd-wrt support

Price: $192

The best Wi-Fi router DIR-890-L in the form of a shuttle with six antennas is perhaps the best and at the same time strange router. Six antennas allow you to use up to three wireless networks simultaneously, two 5 GHz at 1300 Mbit / s according to the 802.11ac standard and a third with a speed of 600 Mbit, according to the 802.11n standard. They are collected under one SSID using the SmartConnect function. This allows the router to approximately determine where the connected device is located, and also give it the best speed depending on the distance.

D-Link recently revamped its routers' software interface with a more intuitive design and additional features. It can be set up using the mobile app, without having to log in to your computer. It also supports remote monitoring via mydisk Cloud, as well as media sharing with any storage device.

10. Apple Airport Extreme

Great solution for Mac OS.

Speed: 1300 Mbps 802.11ac, 450 Mbps 802.11n

Ports: 3 x LAN Gigabit Ethernet, 1 x Gigabit Ethernet WAN port, 1 x USB 2.0 port

Price: $152

Airport Extreme, the best wifi router for home from apple, works perfectly with both regular PCs and Macs. But it's best suited for OS X users thanks to the included Mac program, Airport Utility. Instead of setting up your router through the web interface, you can do all the settings using this program. on Mac computers this works very well.

Additionally, the AirPort Extreme has decent hardware. The latest sixth-generation model supports 1300 Mbps under the 802.11ac standard, and simultaneous operation of 2.4 GHz and 5.0 GHz antennas for 802.11n/g/b/a.

There are three ports for the local network, one WAN, and one USB 2.0 port for shared access to the printer and external drive.

Apple also sells an option with a built-in hard drive for backing up the necessary machines via wifi. The model name is AirPort Time Capsule, does it have all the same features as AirPort Extreme? but with the addition of a 2 or 3 terabyte hard drive, you'll be able to remotely backup or restore files from your Mac.

Conclusions

This list contains the best routers according to techradar. Of course, most of them have a high price, but this is quite normal considering their functionality. The ranking of the best routers has come to an end. Which router do you think is the best? Write in the comments!

What can’t a modern person live without? Without water, food and... internet. Having access to the World Wide Web, we search for the necessary information in it, work, relax, communicate, study, and discover new opportunities. And in order not to be tied to a specific place in the house or office where there is an Internet connection cable, you need to use a Wi-Fi router.

Manufacturers offer different models, including those with designer designs. But the router must be reliable! This is the only way to ensure uninterrupted and constant access to the Internet. Therefore, to make your life easier in the future, you need to choose the best Wi-Fi router available in stores today. And we will help you with this.

Top 10 routers of 2018

When choosing these models, we relied on various criteria:

• user recommendations in online stores and review sites;
• prices;
• parameters;
• functionality;
• common sense (so that the purchase is truly useful).

Why are there no expensive models on our list?

We do not consider this a luxury, since such routers have wide functionality. But the average user will not overpay for appearance or options that they do not use.

How should you choose?

To give advice, you need to understand how an ordinary person answers the question: “How to choose a router?” To do this, just read user reviews of the device installed in their home. This is exactly what we did.

Most users named the stability of the device as the main criterion. Regardless of the requirements or operating conditions, this characteristic was the main one. An equally important parameter is the data transfer speed. This is another criterion that was emphasized in the reviews.

We also believe that ease of setup is important too. Especially for the fair sex, who often have to choose and operate equipment on their own. Sometimes you end up with something like this :)

To confirm our findings, we conducted a small survey. It was attended by users of social networks and visitors to our website. In total, about 150 people were interviewed. They were asked one question: “The most important parameters of a Wi-Fi router” and several answer options:

• data transfer speed (36.6%);
• stability (41.6%);
• safety (9.2%);
• range of transmitted frequencies (1.8%);
• ease of setup (2.5%);
• price (3.3%);
• I don’t pay attention to the criteria (5%).

As a result, as we expected, stability and data transfer speed are the main criteria when choosing a Wi-Fi router.

Characteristics

At the same time, there are a few more important characteristics that you need to pay attention to when choosing a Wi-Fi router.

Data transfer rate

Not the most important parameter, because theoretically even budget options have data transfer speeds of up to 150 Mbit/s over a Wi-Fi channel. It all depends on what speed your provider provides. With an Internet speed of 20-50 Mbit/s, it makes no sense to buy a router with information transfer rates at speeds of 300-1300 Mbit/s.

The most common standard today is the 2.4 GHz frequency. But due to the fact that it is heavily overloaded, this negatively affects the quality of the Wi-Fi signal. The 5 GHz frequency standard is less popular, but not all models support it. Devices of the middle and high price segment simultaneously operate at frequencies of 2.4 and 5 GHz.

Number of antennas

There are models with internal and external antennas. The number of antennas does not increase the propagation range of the Wi-Fi signal, but does affect its stability. The best option today is routers with two external antennas.

Operation stability

This indicator is affected by the router software and the number of antennas. The device firmware must be constantly updated, so it is better to buy devices from well-known and trusted manufacturers who provide technical support for the released equipment even after several years.

Wi-Fi network protection

Most models use the following safety standards:

• WEP (minimum reliability);
• WPA (encryption key length up to 128 bits - TKIP technology);
• WPA2 (encryption key length up to 256 bits - AES technology) is the most reliable standard.

The best models for home

Important! Choosing a router for a home or apartment is no different, because modern buildings have the same structural characteristics and are made from the same materials. Therefore, all the models presented in this list are perfect for use in the house and apartment.

The choice of a Wi-Fi router for the home is different in each individual case, because the user is based on his preferences, considerations and requirements. The devices presented below, in our opinion, are the best choice in terms of quality/stability/price ratio.

Xiaomi Mi Wi-Fi mini

The best solution in terms of price/quality/performance ratio. A model that supports the 802.11a/b/g/n/ac data transfer standard at speeds up to 1167 Mbps, which is a nice addition. The manufacturer offers two firmware options: standard and for developers (has a larger set of functions and access to the router console via ssh). But in both cases it is presented in Chinese.

The USB port is used to connect an external hard drive. A minimal set of options is provided to control it. But the user, using the built-in utilities for the router, can autonomously download files to an external drive by following links to them.

If you have problems accessing the Internet, you can use the standard connection diagnostic utility.

Advantages

• design;
• affordable price;
• WAN speed 1167 Mbit/s;
• the ability to connect an external drive;
• a large set of settings and capabilities in the firmware.

Flaws

• instructions and interface in Chinese;
• two LAN ports;
• LAN port speed 100 Mbit/s.

TP-LINK TL-WA901ND

An equally good purchase would be the Tp-Link TL-WA901ND model. Its main feature is support for the PoE standard, with which power can be supplied to the router via an Ethernet cable. For this purpose, a special adapter is supplied with the device.

The advantages of the device include three removable antennas, which increase the stability of the device with a signal propagation range in open areas - up to 270 meters.

The main disadvantage of the TP-LINK TL-WA901ND model is the lack of LAN ports for connecting computers and laptops. In addition, as users note, it periodically freezes, which is why the router has to be rebooted.

Advantages

• design;
• three removable antennas;
• ease of setup;
• Wi-Fi network range;
• PoE technology.

Flaws

• lack of LAN ports;
• freezing.

ASUS RT-N56U

At first glance, the model catches your eye because it is made in the original case. At the same time, support for two frequency bands (2.4 and 5 GHz) allows it to work stably even in homes with a lot of interference in the absence of external antennas. The data transfer speed via LAN ports is up to 1 Gbit/s, which is very convenient in modern conditions.

The presence of two USB ports increases the functionality of the model, as they allow you to connect an external drive. But the data transfer speed on the HDD is at the level of 14-16 and 10-12 MB/s when reading and writing, so using it to work with large files will be problematic.

The lack of PoE technology limits the mobility of the device, but with such great functionality, the router needs an uninterrupted and powerful power source.

Advantages

• design;
• LAN speed 1000 Mbit/s;
• WAN speed 300 Mbit/s;
• two USB ports;
• ease of setup;
• great functionality.

Flaws

• USB port speed 10-16 MB/s;
• It is not recommended to use external drives with a capacity of more than 1 TB.

Top 5 routers in the budget segment

In this list, we presented budget segment routers, the cost of which will please any buyer, but in use they showed themselves to be good, working stably, reliably and without any complaints from users.

TP-LINK TL-WR841N

Budget router models are devoid of any frills, so it’s difficult to talk about their advantages and disadvantages. The main difference between the TP-LINK TL-WR841N model and other inexpensive devices is the setup interface. It is almost identical to the top models and has a clear structure. Therefore, setting up the gadget will not be difficult even for an inexperienced user.

But the limited speed of the LAN ports (100 Mbit/s) and the low data transfer speed over the Wi-Fi network will not allow you to use it to the maximum under heavy loads. This means it is not suitable for installation in an office.

Advantages

• low cost;
• easy setup;
• clear interface;
• compact sizes.

Flaws

• low data transfer speed;
• job instability;

D-link DIR-300/A/D1

What immediately catches your eye when examining this router is the speed of data transfer over the wireless network. This should alert any buyer, since today some users have access to the Internet at a speed of 1 Gbit/s, for which this model is completely unsuitable. In addition, it has a short range.

But its main advantage is its stylish, modern, interesting design and the WPS button placed on the side, making connecting any gadget convenient and easy. Therefore, the optimal place to use this model is at home.

Advantages

• low cost;
• stylish design

Flaws

• low data transfer speed;
• limited scope of use.

Netis WF2419E

Despite the fact that the device is made in China and belongs to the budget price segment, its build quality is very good. In addition, the factory firmware provides wide functionality of the device, which is not standard for inexpensive models. Therefore, it is perfect for use both at home and in the office.

The router provides high speed data transfer over wired and wireless networks. Given its low cost, this is a huge advantage. In general, the model has proven itself well, as evidenced by the huge number of positive reviews.

Advantages

• low cost;
• high data transfer speed;
• easy setup;
• stable job;
• functionality.

Flaws

• LAN port speed is 100 Mbit/s (although it’s difficult to call this a disadvantage).

Tenda N301

The compact body of the Tenda N301 model makes it easy to install almost anywhere in the home or office. If we add to this the ease of network setup, the device is perfect for use at home even by inexperienced users.

The inability to wall mount the model may become an obstacle to use in some cases. But this is not a critical problem. Otherwise, the router is no different from other representatives of the budget segment, operating at a frequency of 2.4 GHz and having a Wi-Fi data transfer speed of up to 300 Mbit/s.

Advantages

• low cost;
• ease of setup;
• compact body.

Flaws

• unstable work;
• no wall mounting;
• weak signal.

ZyXEL Keenetic Start

This model is the younger “brother” of the ZyXEL Keenetic and differs from it in a smaller set of available options. In addition, it is difficult for it to cope with a large number of connected devices, so it is not suitable for use in an office or in a home where there are a huge number of devices with a Wi-Fi adapter. This is due to the weak processor used on the model.

The ease of setup will please any user. And the lack of heating and the fact that the router does not “cut” the speed distinguish it from many competitors in its segment. In addition, the affordable price makes ZyXEL Keenetic Start an excellent choice for a small house or one-room apartment.

Advantages

• low cost;
• ease of setup;
• does not overheat.

Flaws

• weak processor;
• weak signal;
• Freezes when connecting a large number of devices.

Mobile routers

If you do not have access to wired Internet, you can use mobile Wi-Fi routers that have a slot for connecting a SIM card. They connect to the wireless Internet via mobile communications, after which they “distribute” it to other devices. Check price

It’s worth noting right away that the router only works in 2G/3G networks, therefore it is limited in data transfer speed. In addition, the kit does not include a charger, but only a USB cable. But, on the other hand, this made it possible to reduce the cost of the model and make it more accessible to the user. In addition, sometimes the absence of an LCD display, which is equipped with the “older” model M5350, adds inconvenience.

Disadvantages also include the lack of a “modem” function when connected to a computer. But this is a router, so it should not work in this mode. Otherwise, the router has good technical characteristics, does not freeze, and receives the network well. And if you take into account the compact size, high-quality and non-stainable body, you can safely say that the device can be carried with you in your pocket anywhere.

Advantages

• compact dimensions;
• stable job;
• An adapter for SIM cards is included.

Flaws

• no power adapter;
• works in 2G/3G networks;
• no LCD display.

Conclusions

As a result, we will try to answer the most frequently asked questions. They will help you finally decide which router to choose.

Why should you buy a router?

For a modern person, a Wi-Fi router is an everyday device that helps you access the Internet without being tied to a specific place. If we take into account the fact that the market for mobile devices is growing, and on the contrary, desktop PCs are decreasing, in the future it will be difficult to do without this device at work or at home.

Is it worth buying a cheap model?

Some users may say that buying a mid- or high-price Wi-Fi router is a waste of money. But, having encountered cheap models from my own experience, I made two conclusions.

Firstly, when using them, you will spend a lot of effort and nerves to achieve stable operation.

Secondly, after a while you may need to buy a new router, because the old one will simply stop working for no apparent reason.

Why should I buy exactly the routers described in the article?

We do not force you to buy them, but we recommend that you do so, because all the models described have proven themselves well. And we repeat once again: each person chooses a Wi-Fi router based on their needs and capabilities.

We tried to take into account all the wishes, preferences and main points that buyers pay attention to. And based on this, we presented a list of models that best meet all the requirements.

After two months of research and testing, I can say that the ZyXEL Keenetic Giga III router is the best WiFi router for most users (both advanced and not so advanced). It works in two ranges - this is very important! - it is fast, long-range, reliable and allows you to connect an external hard drive to it via USB 3.0, thus creating a small network storage that operates at an acceptable speed. Plus, users have access to a fairly extensive and detailed help section on the manufacturer’s website, which greatly simplifies the resolution of many issues.

If for some reason Keenetic Giga III is not available for purchase, the next worthy candidate for the role of the best router is TP-Link Archer C7 rev.2. It is not inferior in speed characteristics and range, but has a worse interface, slower access speed to network storage and a worse approach to security. None of these shortcomings are critical, however, if the ZyXEL Keenetic Giga III is available for sale at a similar price, we would still recommend the giga.

If the price of about 7,000 thousand rubles seems excessive to you, then you should pay attention to the cost of 3,500 rubles. It is not inferior in range to the Giga III, but has lower performance; gigabit ports have been replaced with 100-megabit ports, and instead of USB 3.0 ports, only USB 2.0 is left. In other words, it's a good compromise at a good price.

Why should you believe me

I've been tinkering with computer equipment for 25 years. Of these, the last 10 I have been actively publishing in a number of major computer publications. Moreover, on such a highly specialized resource as Habrahab.ru I was given the status of “legend” for my articles, which was achieved by a little more than fifty users in the entire history of the site. And the audience there, I must say, is very, very demanding. So yes, I have a good understanding of technology and you can trust me. But, as is customary on our website, you are not obliged to take the word of a stranger, so I will provide links to other authoritative sources throughout the text.

Who needs a new router and why you don't need a cheap model

In a situation where you don’t have a router, everything is clear - you need to take it, because it’s convenient and sometimes simply necessary. But if you already have a router, then it may very well be time to change it to a modern model. And these are not marketing tricks.

Why your router may not work well

If your router is more than three years old and inexpensive, it most likely operates at 2.4 GHz. There are only thirteen channels on this frequency. Since your neighbors have the same simple router as you, most likely there are several more access points on your channel. Let me give you a simple analogy: each channel is a dedicated lane on the road. If only you use this channel, then the speed of movement is limited only by the capabilities of your car. In other words, if you can go 50 km/h, you are going that fast. If it’s 180 km/h, you’ll go as fast as you can. However, if someone else is sitting on your channel, this is tantamount to crossing an intersection. As soon as your neighbor's router starts transmitting information on your channel, a red light turns on for your car. Accordingly, when the light is green for you, your neighbors’ packages are sadly stomping around in line. And the more active the data transmission, the worse the traffic jams at intersections.

The picture above shows the channel loading in my house. My network (Keenetic-4223) has the highest signal level, the rest of the “hills” are the neighbors’ networks. As you can see, there is not a single free channel where my network and the neighbors’ networks would not interfere with each other. Naturally, as long as I am near the router, I get a more or less stable connection. But as soon as you move into the next room, fierce competition for the range immediately begins.

In the 2.4 GHz range, I repeat, old and cheap household access points work. Meanwhile, modern devices transmit data simultaneously in two bands (in the old 2.4 and new 5 GHz), and in 5 GHz, firstly, there are more channels, and secondly, almost no one sits on them. There are two modern data transmission standards in the 5 GHz band: 802.11n and 802.11ac. You need a router that works according to the Wi-Fi standard 802.11ac, because the previous one, 802.11n, at 5 GHz does not help, since the signal in this range fades and is weakened by any obstacles. And 802.11ac, due to its initially higher theoretical speed (the basis for which, in turn, is a whole bunch of new technologies and algorithms), allows you to achieve acceptable real speed even taking into account strong attenuation.

Thus, if you are tired of dead zones in your home, you are not satisfied with the data transfer speed (for example, video is slow when transmitted to the TV), or your router cannot cope with the load of a large number of connected devices, it may be time to change it to a more powerful one.

Clarification: it is not a fact that a new Wi-Fi router will solve the problem of dead zones, especially since the 5 GHz network has less range than the 2.4 GHz network, but it is very likely that the new model will be more powerful than the previous one. In addition, do not forget the simple rules of how to set up a router - we described them in the article about repeaters.

In addition to the standards, the box usually also contains a designation such as N600, AC1200, AC1750, and so on. This is the maximum speed at which the router's wireless network can operate. However, it works out in a clever way - by summing up the maximum connection speeds in different ranges. For example, the previous generation router, designated N600, has a 2T2R scheme and supports connecting clients in two spatial streams in the 2.4 GHz band at a speed of 300 Mbit/s (150+150) plus similarly up to 300 Mbit/s in 5 GHz. Total 600 Mbit/s. The AC1750 router typically has three streams in the 2.4 GHz band (150+150+150) and three in the 5 GHz band (433+433+433). The total is 1750.

Difficult? Wrong word! But now we’ll get into even greater depths to make it clear why we need just such a router, what we chose and why it costs so much. If you find this boring, you can skip a few paragraphs and go directly to the model comparison section.

The first caveat: speaking about the AC1750 formula, we are, of course, not so much talking about the router as a router, and not even about its built-in Ethernet switch. The AC_how_much_there formula characterizes only the built-in Wi-Fi access point. For some reason, few people think about where a router that only has a gigabit WAN port can output/pump 1750 Mbit/s. Likewise, there are plenty of routers with the AC750/1200 wireless formula, but even having a 100-megabit port for connecting to the Internet.

The second architectural caveat: the router cannot sum up the speed of the ACxxxx formula in any real task, because even in real routing (read communication with the Internet), even in switching (read transmission over a home network) it will always run into a bottleneck. Let's say we have a gigabit router (with a gigabit WAN port and an Ethernet switch) with an AC1750 formula on a gigabit Internet connection. The maximum speed from the Internet, provided that a wireless client ideally matches this formula (if you even find such a device that will work in 3 streams), you will get no higher than 1000 Mbit/s, similarly on a local network. When transferring from one such wireless client to another, you can even theoretically expect only half as much as 1300 Mbps. And if you transmit between 2.4 and 5 GHz networks, the common denominator will be the client speed of 2.4 GHz.

The third caveat (usually already known to many Wi-Fi users): any declared Wi-Fi speeds are channel connection speeds in one pair of router (access point) - client (wireless adapter). This speed is included in the formula we are discussing, it is shown by the adapters and routers themselves in their interfaces, however, the real data transfer speed, which can be felt in a speed test, downloading a torrent or downloading a file, will usually be half as much (to simplify, consider that due to overhead protocol costs and inevitable interference). It is important to understand that Wi-Fi in the same band is a shared medium, and the channel speed is the maximum speed of this medium for the pair. If the access point has to communicate with two clients (for example, transferring from one to another), the actual speed drops by another half.

From here, for a moment, the right to exist for AC1200 models with a hundred-megabit WAN port becomes clear. Let's estimate the scenario for now and for the next 2-3 years: a TV streams heavy content via Wi-Fi (say, a 4K stream from a network storage), backups are being made in parallel, a couple of laptops are surfing the Internet and someone is downloading a torrent (not even about smartphones) I mention). The Internet here is a maximum of one hundred megabits, and the rest will be just 300 Mbit/s remaining from the 400 possible in AC867 5 GHz (TV, backup, taking into account the attenuation of the 5 GHz signal, it will generally be great if they can count on at least 100-150 Mbit/s), web surfing can also be connected via 2.4 GHz. Although, of course, having a NAS on a router with a 100-megabit switch is usually unwise. And the speed here is just right.

Tri-band routers

There are also so-called tri-band routers on sale. Now these are devices that essentially have three access points: one at 2.4 GHz and two non-overlapping ones at 5 GHz (yes, I know that models with a third 60 GHz band of the 802.11ad standard are already looming on the horizon, but that’s a completely different story , many users have never even seen 5 GHz). With an obvious increase in price, such a router provides an advantage only if devices between which maximum speed is required (for example, a high-performance laptop and a computer) are connected to different 5 GHz points. But even in this case, taking into account the above, you can not count on the promised “AC_ogogo” formula, but only on the maximum speed of one of them.

Usually these are the maximum according to the AC1733 standard (4x4), but now it’s time to ask how many adapters and client devices there are in nature that support at least 3x3, not to mention 4x4 (not to mention 802.11ad at all). Smartphones and tablets mostly have a 1x1 adapter, top models have a 2x2 adapter. Rare laptops, like the MacBook Pro, have 3x3 adapters. No less rare 3x3 USB adapters and PCI-E adapters designed for installation in 3x3 or 4x4 desktops are more expensive than many decent routers. Point AC1733, meanwhile, will only give them the speed they can handle. And yet, it’s a big mistake to think that a 4x4 AC1750 point can easily simultaneously “stream” devices with 400 (real) Mbit/s simultaneously on two 2x2 AC867 adapters. Alas, classic Wi-Fi technology still provides clear timeOe separation when servicing client devices: the access point transmits (or receives) the required portion of data first from one client, then from another, etc. It cannot transmit to two at the same time. All this takes time, really high-speed clients do not receive enough speed, slow ones, it turns out, waste point resources in vain.

This could not continue, and for a couple of years now we have been talking about MU-MIMO technology, which, theoretically, should allow simultaneous transmission to several clients. But it stalls horribly. Firstly, it is full of its own limitations. For example, the maximum number of devices that can actually be served simultaneously is limited to four, and simultaneous postback from clients is not supported (hello torrent servers and surveillance cameras). Secondly, in many routers where MU-MIMO was announced, it never really worked. And thirdly - surprise! – it must be supported by the clients themselves. How many are there in nature? That's right, even less than it is unclear how there are routers that support it.

In other words, it’s not like getting ahead of yourself—there’s absolutely no need to even keep up with the locomotive of modern marketing technologies. Let's finally move on to the question of what to choose now.

How we chose

As we said above, we need a router that works according to the 802.11ac standard. We go to Yandex.Market and set up several filters: the presence of an AC standard, a connection speed of at least 1200 megabits (this is how we cut off older models; we discussed why this is important above), a gigabit network port, high user ratings. As a result, we get exactly two models that deserve attention.

• ZyXEL Keenetic Giga III
• TP-LINK Archer C7

Interestingly, many Western publications recognize TP-LINK Archer C7 as the best home router for most users. Moreover, when measuring signal speed and range, it confidently outperforms many of its competitors, for example, the same Asus RT-AC68U. Moreover, Archer C7 allows you to achieve the maximum connection speed of AC1750, while Keenetic only allows AC1200. On the other hand, ZyXEL Keenetiс is deservedly loved in the CIS, its firmware is perfectly adapted for the Russian market, plus, above we have already discussed the features of obtaining these formulas. Well, the more interesting it will be to compare both devices. So, we order and test.

An important point: the TP-LINK Archer C7 router must be of the second revision. The first was somewhat buggy, did not have Russian in the interface and allowed you to connect a smaller number of devices. The revision number can be found on the box.

Zyxel Keenetic Giga III or TP-LINK Archer C7?

In most cases, a Wi-Fi router falls into the “install, configure and forget” category. Therefore, there are only two main requirements for it - that it works quickly and stably and that it “finishes off” as far as possible.

Both candidates are in perfect order with stability - neither of them had any problems after two months of use. As for speed and range, we will now demonstrate it.

So, the performance of both routers was compared under the following conditions: we have a room in which both devices are located. We turn it on and alternately test the signal level and speed on the end device. To measure the signal level, an application for Android WiFi Overview 360 is used, to measure the speed, the iPerf3 program in server mode, launched on a computer connected by wire to the router via a gigabit port. And it’s in client mode, running on a laptop with a dual-band Wi-Fi adapter.

Measurement is carried out at three points: directly in the room with the router, in a room located around the corner through two main walls (a very difficult task for any router) and in a room located at the end of a long corridor 30 meters long.In each of the three cases, we measure the speed on both bands (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz).So, three measurements of the signal level: in the room with the router, behind two concrete walls and at the end of the corridor.

In the same room with the router, when measuring at the opposite end, we see that the signal level in the 5 GHz network is almost the same, but in the 2.4 GHz range the TP-Link router will be more powerful.

Measured through two main walls and at the end of a long corridor:

In both cases, we see that TP-Link has a better signal in the 2.4 GHz band, and Zyxel has a better signal in the 5 GHz band. In theory, 5 GHz is more important to us - in this range the data transfer speed is higher. However, let's see how things work in practice.

Measurements again, now speeds in three positions in each of the network ranges. First, connect the laptop directly with a wire and check the data transfer speed. We get 901 megabits from the kineticist and 902 from TP-link. As they say, close to the gigabit ceiling of the channel. Great, now we start taking measurements at the desired points.

No difference at all. The numbers are so close that their difference can be written into the margin of error. Moreover, please note that the difference in signal level, which we saw in the pictures above, has practically no effect on the data transfer speed.Of course, the laptop is partly to blame here - it cannot work on three spatial streams, like, say, a Macbook Pro. If he had been able to do this, it is quite possible that TP-Link would have shown higher speed (after all, AC1750 versus AC1200 from Zyxel). However, we have a completely average AC chip operating at medium settings.

Theoretically, we can achieve a situation by going to a place where the kinetics signal of the 2.4 network will completely disappear, and TP-Link will still be barely warm. In practice, using the network in this place will be uncomfortable.

And if there is not much difference, then how to choose?

As I said above, if you have several top-end 2016 laptops at home that simultaneously pump a large amount of traffic through them, you may notice a difference in the performance of both routers. In practice, in the next 2-3 years, it’s unlikely. Therefore, you should choose a router based on secondary characteristics, such as interface convenience and additional functions.

So, the interface, ease of setup and additional functions. Here Keenetic confidently holds the palm. Firstly, everything is Russified, including the inscriptions on the ports on the back.

Secondly, its interface is more convenient and allows you to fine-tune everything. Compare:

To be fair, it must be said that alternative firmware can be installed on TP-link, which can significantly expand the functionality. However, it is unlikely that most users will do this.

And thirdly, upon startup, Keenetic immediately prompts you to set a password to access the router and immediately checks for new firmware versions (which, by the way, are released frequently). With TP-Link, to change your password, you need to know where to go. Well, changing the firmware requires going to the manufacturer’s website, finding the firmware from the router of the required revision, downloading it, and then ordering the router to update to it. In other words, most users will never do this. For this, Tp-Link receives a big minus in terms of security - holes in the firmware have not been canceled.

Network storage

Modern routers are powerful enough to turn them into an analogue of NAS - network storage, which can be used by the whole family and all network devices in the house. Those. you can store movies, music and general documents there without taking up precious space on the hard drives of your personal devices. You can also dump backup copies of important files there, which are usually much more valuable than the devices themselves. In other words, this is a file dump for the whole family. Of course, it is better to buy a specialized device, but most people feel sorry for the money on it, especially since many people have external hard drives.

So, modern routers allow you to connect an external hard drive to them and provide round-the-clock access to files. Yes, this is an entry-level NAS, but it copes with simple tasks and allows the user to understand whether he needs it at all. I’ll say right away that it’s necessary (backup is above all!), but many people need to see this from their own experience.

Both routers in question allow you to connect an external drive via USB. However, unlike Tp-Link, Keenetic has USB 3.0 on board, providing high write/read speeds.

Let's compare these indicators in practice:

As you can see, thanks to USB 3.0 we have five times the reading speed of Keenetic. The recording speed is not that different. An important point: when measuring, we used a very mediocre propeller from Silicon Power, which, frankly speaking, does not shine with speed characteristics. The use of more “thoroughbred” media accelerates the reading speed to 80 megabits. However, it was decided to leave the graph exactly this way in order to illustrate the difference in speed even on mediocre hardware.

An advantage of Keenetic is that it has a software module that allows you to download torrents autonomously. Those. you give it a download command, and it writes the required file to the connected hard drive. Another plus in favor of the kineticist.

Another caveat: USB 3.0 operation can negatively affect data transfer in the 2.4 GHz range. Many manufacturers even have a special checkbox in the interface - disable USB 3.0. However, I did not notice any interference when working with the kineticist

Budget router with AC1200 formula

At the beginning of 2017, Zyxel released an excellent compromise router, Keenetic Extra II, in which it replaced gigabit ports with 100-megabit ports, removed USB 3.0 and reduced the price to 3,500 rubles.

The result is an excellent budget router, which in terms of range is almost as good as the Giga III and Archer C7 (see ours). And considering that the software features in it are exactly the same as those of the Giga, we strongly recommend this router to all those for whom maximum performance is not important, but trouble-free operation at a reasonable price is very important.

Conclusions

Based on the above, it may seem that TP-LINK Archer C7 is a bad router. Nothing of the kind, this is the best combination of price/functionality that I have ever seen (especially among routers in the AC1750 standard, we remember that there are never enough flows) and it’s not for nothing that the Western press loves it so much.

It's just that Keenetic Giga III is a little better. Moreover, this is best achieved through additional functions, which include both the above and excellent work with a zoo of printers, security with Yandex.DNS or SkyDNS, and finally connecting DECT handsets. True, the question remains: will the owner use it all?

In other words, TP-LINK is a router that you set up once and forget about it for many years. He has this philosophy of use. But Keenetic, and this is clear, was made in order to work with it more often. Therefore, at the moment, I advise my friends to purchase it. On the other hand, if the TP-LINK Archer C7 is nearby and it costs less, you can safely consider it as a powerful alternative.

The range of Wi-Fi routers is increasing every day. If your eyes run wild in the store and you don’t know which model to buy, then this article is especially for you. Below I will tell you how to choose the right router for your apartment to suit your needs. And also you will find a rating of the best models of 2019.

Popular manufacturers of Wi-Fi routers

There are many popular, and not so popular, router manufacturing companies. We will not list them all here, but will highlight only the main manufacturers who consistently produce new models for our market.

It is immediately worth noting that each manufacturer produces models in different price categories. Therefore, first you need to decide on a budget, and only then choose a device.

1.TP-LINK

A popular manufacturer of computer and telecommunications equipment. They are very popular in our market due to their relatively low price, good build quality and materials. Personally, I recommend choosing a router from the range of this brand. As a rule, they serve for quite a long time (mine lasted more than 3 years) without breakdowns or failures.

2.ASUS

Company producing computer equipment and its components. The routers of this company are distinguished by their high price and corresponding quality. Cheap models can be counted on one hand, but they also have mostly positive customer reviews.

3.D-LINK

Popular manufacturer of network equipment. The product range includes a large number of routers of various price categories. The company specializes exclusively in network technologies, therefore it produces only high-quality products in its segment.

4.ZyXEL

A large Taiwanese company producing network equipment. The production of routers is one of the main directions of the company. The company's equipment prices vary markedly. There are models for budget buyers, and there are models for people with an unlimited budget.

5.Huawei

A rapidly growing Chinese company that occupies one of the leading positions in its industry. Now the company is actively developing the production of network equipment. Customer reviews of the products are mostly positive.

We will not dwell long on choosing a manufacturer. In any case, there is no point in arguing which brand is better. You need to choose among specific models that suit your budget and characteristics. You can compare the best router models in the table below.

Choosing a router for your home. What should you pay attention to?

Each device is designed for specific purposes and tasks. If you are buying a router for the first time, it is important to correctly evaluate the characteristics of the device so that they match your requirements. Below we will write a specific list of characteristics that will help you choose the best router for your home or office.

Wan port type

The most important thing is the WAN port. This characteristic is indicated on all models. It depends on your Internet, so it is important not to make a mistake when choosing this option, otherwise the router simply will not suit you. There are three main types:

• Ethernet- This is a standard connection type that is found on almost all modern Wi-Fi routers. If the Internet in your home is connected via a network cable (not via a telephone), then this type of connection is suitable for you.
• ADSL modem- These are routers that connect to a telephone cable. Please note: if you already have a regular ADSL modem at home, then you can buy a standard router that is equipped with an Ethernet port (it can be connected via an old modem).
• 3G/4G routers- provide Wi-Fi signal distribution from a USB modem. If you need a modem that supports this function, look in the port characteristics for the inscription: USB 3G/4G.

Wi-Fi signal speed

This is one of the most important characteristics that you need to pay attention to first. As a rule, most cheap routers (under 1000 rubles) can provide speeds of up to 150 Mbit/s. If you expect to use Wi-Fi on 1-2 devices, then this speed will be quite enough.

I recommend paying attention to models in the price category of 1,500 rubles and above. Such devices will provide Wi-Fi speeds of >300 Mbps. You can connect several devices at the same time, and the connection will not be interrupted or freeze.

Wireless capabilities also play an important role. Depending on the price category of the models, we recommend choosing the following standards:

• 802.11n- if the router is in the price category up to 2000 rubles.
• 802.11ac- if the router is of average price or higher.

Wi-Fi frequency

Most modern routers support two signal frequencies: 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz. Due to the rapid spread of Wi-Fi in all apartments and offices, the 2.4 GHz frequency range quickly filled up, so the signal transmission speed may suffer.

The newer 5 GHz band provided owners of new routers with a free frequency, and as a result, fast Internet without interference. Therefore, if you have the funds to purchase a router with a 5 GHz Wi-Fi frequency, we recommend choosing this option.

There are also dual-band routers that support two frequencies simultaneously. But such models, as a rule, cost a little more.

Router power and range

This is also a fairly important question, especially if you have a large apartment or country house.

As a rule, the operating range of the router model is not indicated in the specifications. And this is understandable, because this characteristic is influenced by a large number of external factors, which differ for each buyer (wall thickness, type of walls, congestion of the frequency range and other interference).

But how then to choose a Wi-Fi router for a large room?

• Number of antennas. As a rule, the presence of two or three antennas greatly enhances the signal and increases the range of the router. On expensive models, the presence of 3 or more antennas affects the signal transmission speed rather than the radius.
• Antenna power. We recommend choosing models that have antennas with a power of 5dBi or more.
• User reviews. Most often, users provide real examples in the comments. You can compare them with your room and choose the right model.

If you still can’t cover the whole room with one router, then it’s better to buy an additional one.

Rating of the best routers for 2019

The best routers according to user reviews

ASUS RT-N12

This router belongs to the line of “affordable” models from Asus. Designed for use in an apartment (2 or 3 rooms) or a small office. Thanks to two powerful external antennas, it provides high data transfer speeds. ASUS RT-N12 will be enough if you like to watch movies and videos in high quality, or play online games.

Setting up the router takes a few minutes. After completing all the steps in the “setup wizard”, the router will be ready to distribute a Wi-Fi signal. The total signal transmission speed can reach 300 Mbit/s.

Advantages of the router according to user reviews :

• Installation and configuration is quite easy.
• Two powerful adjustable antennas that provide good signal coverage.
• Maximum signal transmission speed: 300 Mbit/s.

Flaws :

• Not identified.

TP-link TL-WR841N

A reliable device for creating wired and wireless connection networks in an apartment or small office. Excellent signal transmission quality is provided by two external antennas. The data transfer speed reaches 300 Mbit/s.

The router complies with the 802.11n standard, but at the same time, is backward compatible with devices with 802.11b/g standards. The functions of parental control, virtual server and quick protection will expand the boundaries of Internet use.

Advantages of TP-link TL-WR841N :

• Strong signal. Two powerful antennas can transmit data over a distance of more than 100m.
• Quick setup using the Easy Setup Assistant program.
• Beautiful, streamlined body shape.

Disadvantages of TP-link TL-WR841N :

• Not identified.

Zyxel Keenetic Start

The Zyxel Keenetic Start wireless router is an excellent option for creating a network in an apartment or office. With its help, you can combine all your existing devices (tablet, laptop, phone) into your home network. The maximum data transfer speed is 150 Mbit/s. This will be enough for watching movies, downloading large files and playing online games.

This router allows you to create guest networks. Therefore, you do not need to give your network login and password to your friends and acquaintances every time. Due to its compactness, the device can be located anywhere in the apartment.

Pros of the router :

• A reliable and stable router that works for a long time without interruption.
• Convenient control, quick setup.
• Compact sizes.

Cons :

• One external antenna, which is why the signal is not strong enough.

D-link DIR-615

A simple router that provides wireless connection speeds of up to 300 Mbps. Installation and configuration of the router is carried out in a matter of minutes, thanks to the built-in setup wizard. Software updates occur automatically from the D-Link update server.

The device allows you to create a guest network in which you can limit the speed of Wi-Fi and access to your home network. D-link DIR-615 is also equipped with a special button to turn the router on/off. Now, when leaving home, you will not need to unplug the device from the outlet.

Pros :

• Wi-Fi speed up to 300 Mbps.
• Wireless capabilities 802.11n, 802.11g, 802.11b.
• Quick installation, convenient setup.
• There is an on/off button.

Cons :

• It gets hot during prolonged use.

TP-link TL-MR3420

The router allows you to set up a high-speed Wi-Fi network connection with the press of one button. Two powerful external antennas provide a stable signal with a speed of 300 Mbps.

This router is compatible with 3G modems. Now you can connect to Wi-Fi in places where 3G/3.75G networks are available.

Advantages according to user reviews :

• You can connect a USB modem.
• Large range due to powerful antennas (more than 100 meters).
• Quick installation and connection.
• Wi-Fi signal speed up to 300 Mbps
• Doesn't cut speed.
• Good quality.

Flaws :

• Not identified.

MikroTik RB951G-2HnD