Which is better iPhone (iPhone) or Samsung (Samsung) - a review of two models of different generations. Which is better iPhone or Samsung: pros and cons of devices

Today in my blog I would like to address a very serious issue that is the subject of fierce debate between two opposing camps, and the question is: what better than Samsung Galaxy S4 or iPhone 5S? I will analyze these two smartphone models, as well as compare them, in this article.

First, I want to say a few words before we get started. comparative analysis. Probably, most of you believe that if my blog is dedicated to Samsung technology, then, of course, the winner will be clear. But I want to immediately assure you, my dear readers, that I will try to be as objective as possible, since my goal is not only to answer your question “Which is better Samsung Galaxy S4 or iPhone 5S?”, but also to answer it, first of all, to yourself.

On any resource on the World Wide Web, if the topic of one of these gadgets, which are sworn enemies and competitors, is touched upon, a dispute and proof will certainly begin that one is better than the other. If you yourself want to know an honest and objective answer to this question, then below you, and I together with you, will receive it.

So, today the latest advanced models are the Samsung Galaxy S4 and iPhone 5S. It is on the basis of these current models that we will draw conclusions regarding who is cooler.

Smartphone manufacturers

Since in our time the brand plays a very important role, before directly analyzing smartphones, we will talk about their manufacturing companies.

This company is well known to almost every person, since every person has household appliances in their apartment of this manufacturer. Samsung is a South Korean company that initially specialized in household appliances, but expanding its horizons by starting to produce mobile gadgets such as tablets and smartphones. The impetus for this was probably the production of computer equipment, laptops and mobile phones, in fact, by connecting which you get a smartphone.

Samsung is a company with a long history, and it began producing mobile phones long before Apple released its first mobile product. Equipment produced by Samsung is famous all over the world. As for the smartphones of this company, they can be compared with the ones produced household appliances: good, high quality, with an adequate price and will not let you down.

Apple - this company also has a long history, but only it, before the start of producing mobile gadgets, specialized exclusively in the production of computers. By the way, Apple computers were very popular.

The Apple company itself is a very branded company, and the release of any of its products is a whole event. If you have a gadget with a bitten apple, then it is a priori stylish and status-worthy. Yes, but with us, first of all, they pay attention to the brand, and then to its creation.

Despite what many believe to be the first touch phone It’s not exactly the iPhone, it’s just that Apple was able to present it to the buyer correctly. However, the iPhone is very popular and quality smartphone, with his own philosophy.

Now let's go over the technical specifications of these two smartphones.

Comparison of parameters of Samsung Galaxy S4 or iPhone 5

Let's start with screens, since we look at them all the time. Samsung Galaxy S4 has 5-inch Full HD Super AMOLED display, with a resolution of 1920x1080, pixel density is 441dpi. In turn, the iPhone 5S includes a 4-inch Retina display, with a resolution of 640×1136 pixels, with a placement density of 326dpi, aspect ratio 16:9. Well, here Samsung Galaxy S4 has no competition: it is larger diagonally, has better resolution screen, while a higher pixel density means a higher quality and clearer picture.

As for the remaining parameters of these smartphones, the S4 has a 4-core processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 600, with a clock speed of 1.9 GHz per core and 2 GB of RAM. The processor in the iPhone5 is a 2-core Apple A7 1.3 GHz, and 1 GB of RAM. As we can see, here too the S4 easily outperforms its competitor from Cupertino.

Now let's compare the physical memory of these devices. Samsung Galaxy S4 includes 16 GB physical memory, iPhone5 has 16/32/64 GB of internal memory, depending on the model. But here it is worth noting this. The Samsung Galaxy S4 includes support for microSD cards up to 64 GB, which its competitor does not have. Some will say that you can buy an iPhone 5S with 32 or the same 64 GB of memory and everything will be fine. But if you compare S4 with 16 GB of memory + microSD card for 64 GB and iPhone5 with 64 GB of memory, then in the first there will be 16 GB more of it, and the cost of such a configuration is several times cheaper than the Apple equivalent, and if we are not unfounded, then by $400.

If we touch on the other parameters, the picture will be exactly the same: in Samsung specifications The Galaxy S4 is confidently ahead of the iPhone 5S. And now the most interesting thing: the Galaxy S4 costs 60% of the price of the iPhone 5S. If you compare the Galaxy S4 in price with budget model– iPhone 5C, then they have almost the same price, but the difference in parameters remains the same. It's funny, isn't it?

General comparison of iPhone 5 or Samsung Galaxy S4

By design, you can’t say that one is better than the other - it’s a matter of taste. What is undeniably better about the iPhone is the orderliness, thoughtfulness and more aristocratic approach to both the design of the smartphone and the operating system. Android is missing something in this regard.

But excessive aristocracy really spoils the iPhone, for example, in strict restrictions. For example, you can’t just copy music from your computer to your phone’s memory, or download it from your favorite music site directly on your tablet. To do this, you must either purchase music from the Apple store or sync it through your computer using iTunes programs. This is very inconvenient, given that our person does not particularly like to pay for content. There are several solutions this issue, but the very fact that this process complicated - very inconvenient. The same goes for ringtones and videos.

Also, the iPhone can't access physical storage, so you'll need to use cloud apps to share files.

What I can't help but praise is the store. AppStore applications it, of course, cannot compare with PlayMarket in terms of convenience and quality.

iPhone or Samsung Galaxy?

To be honest, I tried to be as objective as possible, but the facts speak for themselves. To summarize all of the above, let's list all the main factors, pros and cons, of the two smartphone models under analysis.

Samsung Galaxy S4 is more powerful in terms of parameters, and is also cheaper than its competitor. In addition, S4 has no operating restrictions, which is very convenient for constant use of a smartphone.

The iPhone 5S is a more high-status gadget, where the brand matters first, and then its price and technical characteristics. In addition to its status, the iPhone 5S boasts an interesting, or I would even say peculiar, philosophy.

What is better to buyIPhoney 5S orSamsungGalaxyS4

Surely many potential buyers of one of these gadgets will definitely ask this question. It will be more logical and rational buying Samsung Galaxy S4, and here everything is obvious - it is powerful and cheaper than its competitor. But if status and prestige are important to you, or you don’t bother with parameters and restrictions, then you should choose the iPhone 5S.

It is impossible to say unequivocally that this smartphone is better than another, since each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and each of them is aimed at its own army of buyers.

Today, the most popular mobile devices are produced by companies such as Apple and Samsung. Before choosing a particular brand, you should familiarize yourself with their advantages and disadvantages and determine what better than Samsung or iPhone.

What is better iPhone or Samsung

When choosing a new smartphone, everyone gives preference to certain parameters. But in any case, stability, safety and appearance are important.

Apple is an American developer of mobile gadgets. They are directly produced in China, but the quality does not suffer from this.

Samsung Corporation from South Korea started production mobile devices somewhat later than its competitors. However, no significant lags are observed. Not only wealthy clients, but also budget buyers can purchase Samsung brand products.

Both gadgets have interesting features and opportunities

Table: comparison of iPhone and Samsung

It is impossible to determine exactly which mobile device is better. For those who value security and stability, the iPhone is more suitable; for those who love individuality, the Samsung is more suitable.

Test duel Samsung GALAXY S5 vs. Apple iPhone 5s: battle of flagships

The one who came up with something is not always the one who brought it to fruition. Oh, not always.

Device comparison

Source: ZOOM.CNews

In general, there are many different variations of the Samsung GALAXY S5. We took the G900F model, which is equipped with LTE, a Qualcomm processor and 16 GB memory - this is exactly what we tested and it will most likely become the most popular in Russia.

By the way, about LTE. We had the idea to compare the average data transfer speed by cellular network under the same conditions, but no matter how many tests we conducted, in general, the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 showed similar results. Is that the reception quality according to the indication of the smartphones themselves was still worse for the GALAXY S5.

Appearance, design

Samsung implements many “tricks” only because Apple has them. For example, a fingerprint scanner, which we will talk about below. But sometimes you get the feeling that they put high prices on their products because Apple does so.

But Apple has high-quality materials (metal, tempered glass), and replacing the smartphone with a new one under warranty, while Samsung uses plastic, which they disguise either as metal or as leather. The question is - why? new GALAXY Should S5 cost as much as an iPhone? However, only the most impatient people will pay 30 thousand for a new product from Samsung. If you wait a couple of months, or even a couple of weeks, the price will traditionally drop by 30%.

But imitation of materials is, in our opinion, somehow not serious. A low-slung tinted V-9 with a spoiler and vinyl decals is what Samsung's design is all about. Note that this is generally a problem of Korean design - to fake materials and finishing elements. For example, Korean guitar manufacturers like to “draw” fake screws on the body of the instrument (the author judges by personal experience, because related to musical creativity). Imagine: a three-dimensional convexity that follows the shape of the screw head, there is even a correct slot, but in fact it is part of the body and such a “screw” cannot be unscrewed.

In general, the iPhone not only looks better (although this is rather a subjective parameter), but also “more honest”. Its body is made of higher quality and more expensive materials, which is already a completely objective fact.

On the other hand, GALAXY S5 has dust and moisture protection according to IP67. What does this mean? In theory, complete protection against dust penetration and protection against short-term immersion in water to a depth of no more than 1 m (at the same time, long-term operation under water, like Sony flagships, is not guaranteed). However, the design of the smartphone case does not look very secure. Two things confuse me: the easy-to-open plug for the micro-USB 3.0 slot and the “unfastening” cover.

Even on the brand new GALAXY S5, the flap opens easily. Too easy.

If you don't close the lid tightly, the phone will drown. Every time you change a SIM card or SD card, you will have to carefully check several times whether all the latches are locked. In practice, users often do not notice that one of the latches is not fixed (not specifically on this smartphone, but in general on all smartphones with a similar cover fastening). Well, there is a possibility that sooner or later the latches will no longer hold the lid securely.

The lid is rubberized, but the “reciprocal” part on the body is somehow not worked out.

In general, it is still not recommended to wash your smartphone under running water, and even more so to swim with it (even in fresh water). As for using a smartphone in the rain, the author of this text was caught in the rain several times with an iPhone 5s, and even talked on it, and the smartphone is alive and well.

So, given the higher quality of materials, the iPhone 5s wins in design.

Ergonomics

Ergonomics, in this case, is how comfortable it is in the hand when used (the last clarification is important - we need to not only hold the smartphone, but also press buttons, swipe the screen, etc.). In principle, here both the iPhone and Samsung GALAXY S5 are almost the same, except that because of the large screen, it can be problematic for a Korean to reach the opposite corner of the screen with his thumb.

Yes, we know that some people love it, but the fact is that using the iPhone with one hand is more convenient.

True, it’s easier to press the lock/power button on the GALAXY S5 - it’s on the side.

But speaking of buttons, the iPhone has a silent mode switch. It’s strange that manufacturers didn’t make it a rule to copy this detail: it’s really convenient.

The result? It's a draw - both smartphones have ergonomic advantages and disadvantages in approximately equal amounts.

Screen

It is difficult to objectively compare the screens of different devices. In fact, the only objective parameter for evaluating a screen is the brightness reserve in the sun. Or, more precisely, screen readability under straight lines sun rays. Everything else: size, resolution, subpixel grid, and even color rendition are perceived subjectively. For example, the author of this text immediately noticed PenTile on Samsung screen GALAXY S5, but it has Full-HD resolution and a very high pixel density. But there are people who are not bothered by PenTile even on low-resolution screens (and did anyone even think: “What is PenTile?”).

Or take the screen size: for someone who has a tablet, it is not so important to have big screen. It all depends on the scenario for using the phone: if you read a lot on it, watch movies and play games, then yes, you need a big screen. If you communicate on social networks, listen to music, carry your phone in your jeans (of course, “shovels” like GALAXY Note They also fit in a jeans pocket, but this pocket gets wiped out quickly, unless it’s some kind of Levi’s). That is, with regards to screen sizes, we cannot objectively conclude whether larger is better or worse.

Resolution: than larger size screen, the higher the resolution should be. Ultimately, the determining factor is not the resolution itself, but the pixel density. While most manufacturers are competing in the megapixel race (screens with 2K resolution have already been announced), Apple continues to use a resolution of 1136x640, which is even less than HD (1280x720) and, even more so, Full-HD (1920x1080). However, what does the user get from enlarging the screen? In theory - a clearer picture, but in practice - the iPhone 5s screen is already quite clear, at a distance of 20 cm from the eyes it is almost impossible to see individual pixels. If you look closely, the screen of the GALAXY S5 will not seem clear enough because of the PenTile ( TFT screens with RGB placement of subpixels are sharper at the same pixel density). Can we say that the GALAXY S5 screen is better because it has a higher resolution? It’s unlikely - we’re not concerned about the bare numbers, but the result. Of course, if Apple decides to increase the diagonal of the iPhone, it will have to take care of a higher resolution. But for now, 1136x640 pixels is enough.

Color rendering is an objective parameter in itself, but practice shows that ordinary people They prefer bright, acidic colors rather than natural shades. This applies not only to smartphones, but also to TVs, photographs, and videos. Notice how much brighter and more contrasting modern films have become compared to the hits of the 80s and 90s.

However, neither the iPhone 5s nor the GALAXY S5 can boast of perfect color reproduction. The iPhone turns slightly red, and the Samsung GALAXY S5 is noticeably blue. Due to the temporary lack of spectrophotometer data, this parameter will also have to be rejected as determining - some will probably like the color rendering of the GALAXY S5 more, others - the iPhone 5s.

In general, instead of “acidic” colors in the GALAXY S5 (as in many other GALAXY smartphones), you can choose more natural colors when setting up screen profiles, but few people bother with this. However, this will not stop the screen from turning blue.

The most natural color reproduction is in the “Standard” mode

As for screen readability in the sun, Samsung is perhaps a little brighter than the iPhone. It’s not that it was impossible to read or watch pictures on an iPhone in direct sunlight, there is enough brightness there, but the Samsung is still brighter. Conventionally, the victory in terms of screen quality can be given to the GALAXY S5.

Functionality

There are no questions here - the Android smartphone wins in absentia. If we compare the set of functions in isolation from the implementation of these functions, the Samsung smartphone is the winner. Of course, the iPhone has several tricks in stock that its competitor does not have (as one example, using third party applications it can be used as a guitar processor; there are no such applications on Android, and it’s far from a fact that they can be made), but in any case, the victory in functionality goes to Android. There’s not even anything to discuss here. Swype, NFC, free file transfer via Bluetooth, the ability to send any files by mail or via instant messengers, not just photos, support for SD cards, connection external devices storage via USB and so on - all this iPhone has never been dreamed of and is unlikely to even be dreamed of in the near future.

One of the software guitar processors on the iPhone. Guitarists will appreciate it, others won't care.

Ease of use

We can say, “usability” (ease of use, tracing paper with usability) is reverse side functionality. Do you know the difference between a geek and a regular user? The geek is interested in the set of functions itself, and he divides technology into “good” and “bad” (or “I’ll buy it!” and “I’ll never do it in my life”) solely by the set of functions.

For a simple user, what is more important is how the functions are implemented. And since the market is focused on users, and not on geeks (there are more users and their ability to pay, oddly enough, is higher), it was the insufficiently convenient implementation that actually “killed” some functions, and even entire groups of devices.

For example, tablets on “desktop” operating systems existed before, but stopped being produced and sold ten years ago due to the fact that they were too inconvenient: with a very inaccurate stylus (it was impossible to operate the screen with your fingers), a weak battery (3 -5 hours of work maximum), heavy, bulky. When the iPad appeared, it was (and remains) much less functional, but it was thanks to its high usability that it not only became very popular, but also gave birth to a whole class of devices - tablets on mobile OS.

Another less obvious example: helmets virtual reality. They were invented back in the 90s and they had similar problems - large weight and dimensions, low resolution, high price. Today, helmets are slowly being revived, but only because they have become lighter, cheaper and have received permission modern TVs(well almost). And even then, mass demand has not yet been observed, although geeks are delighted. But in any case, the implementation of functionality has seriously improved.

In short, to a simple user A poorly implemented feature is unnecessary. He needs a ready-made device that, out of the box, does what it can do well and without any extra persuasion. In this sense, Apple devices win - with sufficient functionality, they can be quickly learned and easy to use. Perhaps, if we compared the iPhone 5s with some top-end smartphone Windows Phone, here there would be either equality or even a victory for Windows Phone (smartphones on this OS are even less functional, but at the same time simpler).

However, they could easily make a convenient and simple smartphone on Android OS. There are even such, although there are very few of them. Manufacturers themselves overload the interface in pursuit of a large number functions that are then used by a negligible percentage of users. GALAXY S5 is an excellent example of this: overloaded menus in which it is difficult to find what you need, a bunch of incomprehensible settings, sometimes exotic, which are “equally” mixed with truly useful ones.

After spending an hour or two on your phone, you will be able to select the ones you need from these shortcuts.

A simple example - we needed to find an LTE switch setting. Which of the Network Connections group shortcuts do you think contains this setting?

Some menu items are present in several groups at once, which greatly increases their already rather large list.

The correct answer is “Other networks”.

Or take the applications. When you first launch the GALAXY S5, the user finds 47 application shortcuts in the menu various applications. However, among them there is no office suite, clients social networks and games. What are 47 labels for? Obviously, this number is excessive. See for yourself: two browsers (standard and Chrome), two email applications (Gmail and universal), two “Music” applications and another “Play Music”, “Books” and “Play Books”, two “Play Movies” applications (in the name of one of them there is a colon between the words) and another one - “Video”, two photo galleries: “Gallery” and “Photo”, shortcuts “Settings” and “ Google Settings"(and also separately - just Google). Why does the user need all this? And most importantly, why do we need two or three applications that perform the same function?

This is all installed in the Samsung GALAXY S5 by default. For what?

If you are an Android connoisseur and don't understand the problem, put yourself in the shoes of someone who doesn't know what the differences are. standard browser Android from Google Chrome(considering that the first one can synchronize with Chrome data) - how should he feel seeing all this on his smartphone?

Of course, Android fans will say that everything can be customized. But think about how logical this sounds: a person who prefers conciseness and simplicity will sit and customize a smartphone for several hours? Is this conciseness and simplicity? Of course not. This person will simply buy another smartphone. For example, iPhone 5s.

Performance

We added the “performance” paragraph only because many readers would probably look for it, and if they didn’t find it, they would write us an angry comment. But, in fact, comparing the performance of the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 is pointless. Or, more accurately, aimlessly. Both smartphones cope well with all the most sophisticated games, play Full-HD videos (including from YouTube) and smoothly render interface animations.

In general, even if we found some adequate benchmark (except for the Futuremark graphics test for mobile devices) that would allow us to objectively compare different hardware on different operating systems and bring the results to a common denominator, there would be no sense in this research . This is not a PC where you can read the review new video card(or gaming laptop) and draw a conclusion: is this hardware enough for you to launch the next Crysis or not.

As for the difference in the “bit” of processors (64-bit for the iPhone 5s and 32-bit for the GALAXY S5), the comparison is meaningless here too. For iOS there is a musical GALAXY app Band, which allows you to create 32 music tracks on smartphones/tablets with a 64-bit processor, while on devices with a 32-bit processor it’s only 16 more expensive. But there is no such application for Android, and therefore the GALAXY S5 does not lose anything from the fact that it “only” has a 32-bit processor.

Fingerprint sensor

A fingerprint scanner was installed in smartphones even before the iPhone - a well-known fact. For example, in the Toshiba Portege G900. However, the idea did not take root - it was inconvenient to use (remember the discussions above about usability?). Apple decided to rework the idea and came up with an optical sensor that works quickly and to which you just place your finger, rather than moving along the sensor in a certain direction and at a certain speed.

As a rule, what appears in the iPhone will soon appear in other manufacturers. True, HTC managed to do it before Samsung, having built a fingerprint sensor into HTC One Max. The sensor, however, was an old type, not at all like Apple’s, and was located on the back of the smartphone.

Setting up fingerprints on iPhone 5s

In the GALAXY S5, Samsung placed the sensor in the home button - like the iPhone 5s. True, here too the sensor is not optical, and therefore is inferior to the sensor in the iPhone 5s in all respects:

– in GALAXY S5 you need to move your finger along the sensor (and not very quickly, otherwise it won’t work), but in iPhone 5s you just need to touch it;

– if on the iPhone 5s your finger can be placed in any position, then on the Galaxy S5 - only strictly perpendicular to the bottom edge of the phone;

– in GALAXY S5 you must move the entire pad of your finger over the sensor; if you miss it a little, it won’t work;

When you need to quickly unlock a smartphone, it rarely works the first time

– in the iPhone 5s you can remember up to five fingers, but in the GALAXY S5 - only three (the author of this article would need 4 fingers: two thumbs and two index fingers).

Setting up fingerprints in GALAXY S5

In general, Samsung could, for example, add the ability to use fingerprints to launch certain applications, as HTC did, but, alas, Koreans only spy on Americans. But in vain. It turns out that the fingerprint sensor in the GALAXY S5 is inferior even to that in the HTC One Max, not to mention the iPhone 5s.

Camera

We have written more than once (and clearly demonstrated) that the quality of a camera is not measured by megapixels. Actually, Apple has not increased the number of megapixels in iPhones since the iPhone 4S, but the quality of shooting has increased. For example, photos from the iPhone 5s differ from those from the iPhone 5 with higher sharpness and increased dynamic range.

As for the comparison with the Samsung GALAXY S5, the situation is similar - pictures from the iPhone 5s are sharper, you can see this below (on the left - iPhone 5s, on the right - Samsung). We reduced the size of a 16-megapixel image from the Samsung GALAXY S5 (which should have increased the sharpness of the image compared to a 100% crop) so that the size of objects from the cameras of both smartphones were approximately the same. It is worth noting here that the viewing angle is samsung cameras The GALAXY S5 is narrower (again, this in theory should have resulted in higher sharpness of distant objects) than the iPhone 5s. We have highlighted in red those areas that are worth paying attention to.

Left - iPhone 5s, right - GALAXY S5.

As you can see, even despite the lower resolution and more wide angle review, 100% crop with the iPhone 5s boasts higher sharpness. In the pictures from the iPhone you can see tree branches even where the Samsung has solid soap.

However, the GALAXY S5 has a wider dynamic range. This can be clearly seen from the following photographs taken in HDR mode (the first photo is from an iPhone, the second is from a Samsung GALAXY S5).

Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.

However, the bad thing is that on the GALAXY S5 the HDR mode must be turned on forcibly, while on the iPhone 5s it works automatically.

The wide dynamic range of the Korean is clearly visible when shooting in the dark:

Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.

On the other hand, the iPhone 5s showed exactly the picture that the user would most likely want to see. It is unlikely that anyone will be interested in color noise in the dark.

A few more pictures:

Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.

Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.

Clicking on a thumbnail will open a full-size image.

The color rendition of both cameras is a controversial issue. On the one hand, GALAXY S5 shows a picture closer to reality (although I would like to remove the green tint from the blue sky, there is too much of it), on the other hand, how long have you seen realistic photographs in photo albums? Colors are “cool” now on everything, even professional photographers. Some of them prefer bright, saturated colors, others prefer muted colors, like in old films on film. But both of them do not correspond to what the eye sees.

In general, the GALAXY S5 camera has a lot of settings. And this is rather bad (see the section on “ease of use”). A phone is not a professional camera, here you need to do this: point the lens, press a button, get an excellent (at the maximum capabilities of the smartphone camera) photo.

In our opinion, even the iPhone camera interface is slightly overloaded; they could have made it simpler.

But with the GALAXY S5 everything is much more complicated. Try to guess the first time where to switch the video recording speed, for example?

Well, below you can see the result of that same slow-motion video recording. The top video is from an iPhone, the bottom one is from a Samsung GALAXY S5.

Video from iPhone 5s

Video from GALAXY S5

Here you can see a few more interesting moments. Firstly, both smartphones downgraded video resolution from Full-HD to HD without warning. At the same time, the video from the Galaxy S5 shows that in reality the resolution is even lower (most likely, it is 720i instead of 720p).

Secondly, GALAXY S5 recorded a video without sound, whereas iPhone sound on the spot.

At the same time, in the usual GALAXY mode The S5 can record videos in Ultra HD quality, something the iPhone doesn't yet offer.

Verdict? iPhone has better sharpness, GALAXY S5 more features, but overall the quality is comparable. But since we are talking about the phone camera, where large number functions only gets in the way, victory for the iPhone 5s.

Autonomy

There is no direct relationship between the frequency of the processor and the performance of the device built on it (let’s once again give an example about the PlayStation 4 with a 1.6 GHz processor and the PlayStation 3 with a 3.2 GHz processor). That is, if you take a specific processor and overclock it to specific device, then yes, performance will certainly improve, although not linearly. But if we are talking about different processors And different devices, running on different operating systems, then you can completely forget about the clock frequency.

Why are we talking about processors in the “autonomy” paragraph? But because, unlike performance, the connection between processor frequency and power consumption is direct. Of course, technology, instruction set, number of cores - all this also affects, but, as a rule, the higher clock frequency processor, the more electricity it “eats”. We specifically emphasize this point to explain why an iPhone with a 1560 mAh battery lasts as long as a Galaxy with a 2800 mAh battery. Of course, with a similar use case.

In terms of autonomy, it's a draw.

Comparison results

Comparing two devices with different operating systems is simply not correct. People buy iPhones for working with iOS, for services, and, in the end, for the fact that it’s just an iPhone.

The average buyer usually doesn’t care how many gigabytes of RAM it has installed and what frequency its processor has – it works and is pleasing to the eye, but that’s fine.

Android users choose their smartphones based on device performance, power and battery life, and for many, the version of the OS itself and camera megapixels are also important.

Despite the different operating systems, we will carry out comparative review iPhone 5s and Samsung galaxy s5 let's try to find out which is better.

The approaches to devices are different, they are used for completely different purposes, and before making a choice, you need to understand what this smartphone is for, and only then compare the characteristics.

And here is a comparison of characteristics:

Smartphone screens

The display size of the Samsung device is a whole inch larger - 5.1 versus 4 for the iPhone, and the resolution is 1920 by 1080 versus 1136 by 640, respectively. The pixel density of the Galaxy S5 screen is 432, versus 326 for the Apple device. Considering the size of the displays, the image clarity is approximately the same, so it cannot be said that Apple’s display is worse according to the stated parameters.

Processors

The iPhone has its own Apple A7 processor with two cores and a frequency of 1.3 GHz. The Samsung Galaxy is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 processor with 4 cores and a frequency of 2.5 GHz.

You might be interested in

Operating systems

As stated above, this is the main and most defining difference between these smartphones.

If a person wants iOS, then even if the device on Android is at least ten times more productive in terms of parameters, it still will not change his decision.

So if you already have iOS devices or are planning to purchase them, or want to combine and synchronize your devices into one ecosystem, then your choice is iPhone.

Will you choose iPhone 5s?

In all other cases - Android. Because sharing devices on different OS will only bring unnecessary problems with synchronization, compatibility of services and payment for all kinds of subscriptions, which are different everywhere. And for applications from the store, which each OS has its own, you will have to pay separately.

Flagship RAM

Samsung has completed its flagship RAM 2 gigabytes. For Android devices this is very important indicator, so the quantity here is completely justified. In the iPhone 5s, this figure is limited to one gigabyte and this is more than enough for the system to operate.

Physical memory

Both smartphones are available in 16 and 32 gigabyte versions, the only difference being that the iPhone does not have the ability to expand the amount of memory using an SD card, while the Samsung Galaxy s5 supports up to 64GB.

Smartphone cameras

Size Samsung matrices is 16 megapixels for the main camera, which is also equipped with flash and autofocus, and 2 megapixels are allocated for front camera. The iPhone installed an 8-megapixel matrix and also equipped it with a flash and autofocus, as well as face recognition and image stabilization.

Comparing batteries

The battery capacity of both smartphones is enough for active use during the day, and at night you will have to charge it. In terms of numbers, the iPhone is powered by a 1,560mAh battery, while the Samsung runs on a 2,800mAh battery.

Articles and Lifehacks

Buying new mobile gadget today is complicated by a wide range of such devices. The question is which is better: iPhone 5 or Samsung Galaxy 4, often worries many future buyers, since these devices are in great demand on the market. The question is much less relevant, since these models have already disappeared from the shelves.

It is Apple and Samsung that are leading the market today. It is difficult to say which of them is the most competitive, although there are different expert opinions. The products of these manufacturers are equally attractive. Well, thanks to the fact that from the moment Galaxy release Enough time has passed between S4 and iPhone 5; it won’t be that difficult to compare their main characteristics with each other.

Which is better: Samsung Galaxy S 4 or iPhone 5? Comparing the screen, display and body

Let's start with the display size. Top flagships running the Android operating system and their modifications are known for constantly increasing the screen diagonal. Galaxy smartphone The S4 has a 5-inch display diagonal, while the iPhone 5 has only 4 inches. Of course, the experience of working with a Samsung device is therefore more pleasant, although there are many supporters small devices, who do not like large dimensions.

Despite the fact that the S4 model in the Galaxy line has become 3 grams lighter compared to its predecessors, the Apple gadget still weighs less - although this is not surprising, given the different dimensions of these devices. Number of pixels Galaxy display The S4 is also much larger than the iPhone 5, but this is almost invisible to the naked eye.

At first glance, a Samsung smartphone does not give the impression of an expensive flagship. It's all about the plastic from which it is made. However, keep in mind that this is a durable and resistant material.

Unlike Samsung, Apple made the body of its device from aluminum. Despite this, sales of the Galaxy S4 still managed to exceed all record levels, since the buyer preferred a plastic (polycarbonate) case. Apparently, most consumers are quite satisfied with a powerful and simple device.

Let's continue to talk about which is better: iPhone 5 or Samsung Galaxy with 4. Now let's move on to comparing processors, RAM and ROM, batteries, cameras and network capabilities.

Samsung Galaxy S 4 or iPhone 5: which is better? Other device characteristics

Theoretically Galaxy processor S4 is beyond competition. However, do most applications need this kind of performance? Apple Company also has one significant advantage: it is known for its well-coordinated work of hardware and software. It is quite difficult to argue about what is more preferable for a particular user. The same applies to comparisons and other “fights” between Apple and Samsung.

As for memory, the Galaxy S4 leads in two indicators: both RAM and ROM. In addition, thanks to memory card support internal memory devices can be expanded even further. The iPhone 5 does not have this feature.

The battery capacity of a Samsung smartphone also exceeds that of an Apple battery. However, do not forget that such a powerful processor and powerful screen will consume a lot of energy.

The Galaxy S4 camera has 5 more megapixels than the iPhone 5. Of course, more megapixels in itself does not guarantee great photos. However, we add that Samsung has equipped its device with many interesting additional functions.
Network capabilities can be called equal for both smartphones. Both the iPhone 5 and Galaxy S4 offer two ways to access the Internet.

Finally, we note that the operating room Android system, which runs the Samsung device, provides the user with much more options for customizing their device. We can download many interesting applications from Play Store, and also take advantage of the most various functions. However, today there are many supporters of conservative minimalism and “closedness” iOS systems Apple company.