Which processor is better snapdragon or mtk. Which processor is better

A real race has broken out between manufacturers in the smartphone market. In 2018, the reality is that sales of mobile devices are significantly ahead of laptops. In this regard, it would be logical to analyze the best processors for smartphones.

But first, let's clarify, because saying “processor” in the case of smartphones is not entirely correct. Phones and tablets are currently based on SoC (System-on-a-Chip) system. It is a crystal that includes various modules: a computing unit, a graphics core, communication components (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.), RAM and much more.

Go and buy new processor It won’t work for your smartphone, if only because they are not on sale. It is also worth considering that the same SoC can work differently on different smartphones, so we were based on test results from popular Western sources and benchmark tests and prepared the top 10 best processors in terms of performance at the end of 2018.

Top 10 best processors for smartphones

Pay attention! All prices are indicated for smartphone models equipped with the processors listed below.

10 Helio X30

Deca-core processor
Country: China
Average price: 17,240 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.3

First ten-core mobile system became one of the most powerful in 2017. X30 ranks 10th in performance among best processors for 2018. This was facilitated by a new technical process measuring 10 nanometers. Compared to the previous generation, the “stone” has become 35% more productive and 50% more energy efficient. There are three clusters on the board. The first one has two cores Cortex-A73 with a frequency of up to 2.5 GHz. The second consists of four Cortex-A53 cores with a frequency of up to 2.2 GHz, and the youngest has four Cortex-A35 cores with a rate of 1.9 GHz. The GPU is PowerVR 7XTP-MP4 with a frequency of 800 MHz. The solution is capable of decoding 10-bit 4K2K video with HDR10 support.

A peculiar novelty was the introduction of a new technology for managing processor cores called CorePilot 4.0. It can save up to 25% more energy than version 3.0. Intelligent system task scheduling together with the UX Monitoring system and SystemPowerAllocator (SPA) power management helps the architecture perform well in resource-intensive tasks.

9 Snapdragon 710

Budget processor from Qualcomm
Country: China
Average price: RUB 27,766.
Rating (2018): 4.4

The 710 model is an intermediate link between the top-end 800 series and more budget models. It combines flagship capabilities in the field of photography, video shooting and provides good artificial intelligence for use at the best price. In addition, autonomy has increased due to improved production technology.

This stone is the heir to the best mid-budget mobile processor Snapdragon 660, released in 2016. The system has eight Kryo 360 cores on the chip, based on architecture from ARM. Four cores with the index A-75 operate at a frequency of 2.2 GHz, another four - A-55 produce a frequency of 1.7 GHz. In fact, there are cores from Snapdragon 845 here, but they have lower frequencies in accordance with their category. The Adreno 616 is responsible for graphics output, and it is assisted by the Spectra 250 image processor, which supports dual 20-megapixel cameras.

8 Kirin 970

Technological breakthrough from Huawei
Country: China
Average price: RUB 27,990.
Rating (2018): 4.4

Single-chip system Kirin 970 was a real revelation from Huawei. A separate neuromorphic processor with its own single-chip system is designed to solve the highest-intensity tasks in neural networks, computer vision and pattern recognition systems. The processor NPU provides up to 25 times faster performance than similar systems and 50 times better energy efficiency. Thus, performance increases and heat dissipation decreases. Besides, Huawei was given access to the internal filling of the NPU block, which will allow developers third party applications optimize your products for this hardware.

Additionally, it is worth highlighting the presence of a dual signal processor, which allows for motion capture and face detection. These functions include four-level hybrid autofocus and improved shooting of moving objects in low light.

7 SNAPDRAGON 835

People's favorite
Country: China
Average price: RUB 30,790.
Rating (2018): 4.6

This processor is installed on well-known mobile smartphones Samsung Galaxy S8 and One Plus 5. But unlike Exynos, this model can be easily found on large quantities other Android smartphones, most of which are more affordable than the Korean ones.

In terms of performance, there are 8 cores (4 cores operating at 2.45 GHz and 4 cores at 1.9 GHz) and a good graphics accelerator - Adreno 540. Performance in synthetic tests comparable to Exynos, the difference is about 7%, but in everyday use you are unlikely to notice this difference.

Advantages:

• Excellent performance
• Widespread on sale
• Low cost

6 Exynos 8895

Power at an affordable price
Country: Vietnam
Average price: RUB 35,489.
Rating (2018): 4.6

Basis for flagship smartphones, technological know-how from Samsung - this is how this processor can be characterized. Its frequency can reach 3 GHz, and the model itself will be the first in model range Samsung, made using a 10 nanometer process technology. 8 cores will be responsible for performance, working effectively in both single-core and multi-core modes.

Power consumption is extremely low and is only 5 W. It also has the ability to record 4K video at 120fps, which is four times faster than its competitor - the Snapdragon 835 is limited to 4K video at 30fps. One of the disadvantages is the performance limitation due to support for DirectX 11. Despite this, the stone supports Vulkan 1.0. Data transfer is also limited to dual-band 802.11 Wi-Fi. Thus, smartphones with this mobile processor will be an excellent option for video recording enthusiasts.

5 Snapdragon 845

Powerful and most common processor
Country: China
Average price: RUB 21,490.
Rating (2018): 4.7

This processor uses universal computing cores of its own production, and not the reference one from ARM. New process technology with index 10 nm LPP FinFET , allows for greater performance gains compared to 10 nm LPE FinFET. The best combination of mass production, performance and cost made the processor the most popular among manufacturers.

It inherited the same eight-core architecture from the 835 model. The configuration here consists of 4 energy-efficient cores with a frequency of up to 1.8 GHz for performing light tasks and 4 high-performance powerful cores with a frequency of up to 2.8 GHz, which is higher than the previous generation. In the synthetic Antutu test, it scored 270,461 points, which is higher than 835. The Adreno 630 mobile video accelerator is one of the most powerful on the market and performs well when working with graphics, providing high-quality images to the smartphone user.

4 Kirin 980

7 nm process technology
Country: China
Average price: 76,990 rub.
Rating (2018): 4.7

Kirin 980 is ahead of its time thanks to the best technical innovations, including:

• An innovative approach to creating the core processor architecture and the latest mobile chipset with a 7 nm process technology;
• Use of Cortex-A76 core in the architecture;
• Two neural network modules in the chip;
• Graphics Mali-G76;
• Built-in Cat.21 modem with data transfer speeds up to 1.4 Gbps;
• Support RAM LPDDR4X format with a frequency of 2133 MHz.

Thanks to the transition to a 7-Pnm process technology, productivity has increased by 20% and energy savings by 40%. At the same time, the density of transistors increased by 1.6 times. There are about 7 billion of them in total. This also had a positive effect on the performance per core, which increased performance by 75%. Thus, the component’s power is enough to outperform even one of the best and most powerful processors today, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, in synthetic tests like GeekBench.

3 Exynos 9810

The best processor from Samsung
Country: Vietnam
Average price: RUB 51,490.
Rating (2018): 4.8

New processor from Samsung takes the degree of interaction between the owner and his device to a new level. Advanced technologies make it possible to identify objects or people for quick search or image classification. There is also the ability to scan facial contours to unlock your smartphone. As for the structure, the processor itself belongs to the 3rd and latest generation in the line. It is characterized by extensive data processing capabilities and optimized cache memory. Eight cores are divided into “user” for normal tasks and “resource-intensive” for “heavy” processes.

Thus, the processor performs excellently in all tests, demonstrating excellent computing capabilities and smooth operation while running many processes with minimal power consumption. In addition, data transmission channels ( 1.2 Gbit/s and 200 Mbit/s respectively) provide comfortable data transmission of any format without loss of quality.

2 A11 Bionic

One of the most powerful chipsets in the world
Country: USA
Average price: RUB 51,990.
Rating (2018): 4.9

The fifth generation processor has become 25% more powerful than the A10 version. It is manufactured using a 10 nm process technology, which, together with special technology increase energy efficiency by 70%. The performance improvement can be attributed to the processor cores called Monsun and Mistral. This chipset has two additional cores and is capable of asymmetric multiprocessing. This means that it can use all six cores simultaneously.

The processor is equipped with a new ASP, which helps with the new portrait mode. Dual-parallel cores can process up to 600 billion operations per second and create effects even on video. Delightful Animoji are made possible thanks to a powerful neural engine. Despite the excellent performance, this processor can only be found in smartphones from Apple, which is a significant disadvantage.

1 A12 Bionic

The best processor from Apple
Country: USA
Average price: 91,900 rub.
Rating (2018): 5.0

Version A12 is considered the best and powerful processor in the world. Upon inspection, one immediately notices the balanced use of the lithographic plate area without imbalance to one or another component. Two large performance cores operate at a frequency just below 2.5 GHz. Nearby is a monstrously large 8 MB cache, divided into 4 clusters grouped into two blocks. The most noticeable change was the increase in the level 1 cache from 64+64 to 128+128. 4 energy-efficient tempest cores also have a level 2 cache in two blocks, approximately one megabyte each. System cache remained in its place and is still placed outside the boundaries of the CPU. High-performance cores in the new iteration have become 15% more powerful, and energy efficiency has increased to 50%.

The processor has a graphics accelerator with a neural processing unit. It consists of 6 cores in a 2+4 configuration and performs up to 5 trillion operations per second, which is 9 times faster than the previous generation. This “stone” can be found in the latest models of IPhoneXS/XR smartphones; in addition, a version of the chip with the 12X index is used in the iPad PRO.

What is a processor?

Without going into details, this is the central element of the system, which is responsible for all information transformations and controls the computing process.

Mobile version chip (ARM) is not much different from its stationary counterpart. The only differences are in size, power and clock frequency.

The latter have lower figures.

All of them have achieved success in this industry, but the main struggle is between Chinese company MediaTek and American Qualcomm.

Qualcomm

The silicon giant was founded back in 1985. The company was engaged in the production of phones, GPS modules and wireless devices.

We will consider it as the largest manufacturer of mobile chips.

In 2005, they licensed ARM technologies, purchasing the rights to create the Cortex A8 core. Based on it, our own chip was developed.

The top line of chips is called Snapdragon.

These processors are installed in such flagship devices as Sony Xperia Z line, HTC One, LG G2 and G3 and some models Samsung.

But the latest top-end chip Snapdragon 810 has caused a lot of discussion. Some said that it overheats a lot, causing performance to suffer.

But this fact remained undocumented.

8 cores, Cat 6 LTE chip, giving speeds up to 300 Mbps, support for 4K video, as well as sensors up to 55 MP. The figures are impressive.

MediaTek

They take advantage not only of quality, but also of mass production, supplying products to all smartphones costing up to $200.

The most famous “stone”, namely MT6592, installed on budget phones like Lenovo, in particular the S860 and more.

They were the first to develop a 10-core processor called Xelio X20. On at the moment is the most powerful single-chip system in the world.

Recruits more than 70,000 “parrots” in AnTuTu. Not yet serially produced.

Specifications include 3 blocks of cores: 2x2.5 GHz, 4x2 GHz and 4x1.4 GHz. Mali 800 graphics and support for 2 13 MP sensors. Supports Wi-Fi 802.11ac and LTE Cat 6.

Apple

Cupertino residents have always been famous for their closeness. Their unofficial motto can be interpreted as follows: “You don’t need to know what’s inside. Just take it and use it."

And this applies to all the company’s products.

As for the mobile division, the situation here is no less confusing.

It is only known that the company itself develops processors for smartphones and tablets, assigning them an A index and a serial number.

In particular, A8 and A8X are considered the most powerful mobile stones. They are equipped with iPhone 6/6 Plus And iPad Air respectively.

Despite 2 cores at 1.4 GHz and an M8 coprocessor, the performance is impressive.

Intel

Despite the fact that this giant leads the ranking of mobile processors for laptops, in the field mobile development he actually sits on the bench of spares.

Although the fact that smartphones come with Intel chips Atom are in high demand, we can say that the company is making progress.

Now the strongest chip that is used in series is Z3580. 4 cores at a frequency of 2.33 will give a head start even to such “players” as Snapdragon 801 and Apple A7.

Specifications: 4x2.33 GHz, DDR-1600 support and proprietary graphics from Intel.

Nvidia

The situation with a company that is famous for gaming and overclocker video cards similar to Nvidia.

In their main field, they achieved outstanding results, but things didn’t work out with the mobile segment.

In particular, Tegra chips have good potential, but leading manufacturers are in no hurry to purchase processors in batches.

Yes, Nvidia hardware will be appreciated by gamers.

But the majority of smartphone users are businessmen, young people over the age of 20, and girls who are unlikely to want to “play Doom on ultra.”

They use proprietary processors. Other companies create their gadgets based on chipsets from Qualcomm and MediaTek. Both of these companies have dominated the market for third-party mobile chipset developers for several years following the exit of players such as Texas Instruments, Intel and NovaThor.

We offer you comparative analysis MediaTek and Qualcomm as two leaders in their field.

CPU Manufacturing Technologies

As for the technologies used in the construction of CPUs, Qualcomm has previously created its own Kryo cores. Since 2017, the company has moved to more standard Kryo Gold and Kryo Silver cores, built on Arm cores that are more powerful and more energy efficient.

MediaTek also uses Arm cores, but does not modify them like Qualcomm does.

Qualcomm is using the latest and most powerful cores, such as in the new Snapdragon 675 processor. MediaTek is not yet using the latest Arm designs (Cortex-A76, A75 and A55). From this comparison, only one conclusion can be drawn - both Qualcomm and MediaTek use the same cores in their processors, but the first company quickly adapts the newest ones to its needs.

GPU: Qualcomm's secret weapon

Graphics coprocessors are a serious advantage for Qualcomm. It exists thanks to Adreno graphics processing technology, which Qualcomm acquired through its acquisition of AMD's handheld GPU division (Adreno is an anagram of Radeon, AMD's graphics brand).

Adreno graphics coprocessors are currently outperforming Mali coprocessors - this can be seen in benchmarks, for example, Galaxy smartphones S9 with Qualcomm-based chipsets compared to the same phone models based on Exynos chipsets. To get around this and give their phones an edge, Samsung and Huawei are simply using more Mali GPUs. This allows them to catch up with Qualcomm with Adreno coprocessors, closing the gap - but only due to quantity.

The new Mali-G76 GPU will be a significant breakthrough, but Qualcomm developers are preparing a worthy response to it and plan to announce a new flagship graphics processor in December.

Machine learning

In recent years, Qualcomm has been using its Hexagon digital signal processor (DSP) for machine learning tasks. It performs tasks related to audio processing, photo processing, as well as some types of connections. This company, unlike Apple and Huawei, did not develop a separate processor for artificial intelligence tasks.

The latest Hexagon 685 DSP is used in the Snapdragon 845, Snapdragon 710, Snapdragon 670 and Snapdragon 675 chipsets. Therefore, smartphones based on these processors cope better with image recognition tasks.

MediaTek, in turn, presented its AI processing unit (APU) for mid-range phones based on the Helio P60 chipset. This block is designed to recognize faces and images during shooting.

Developer support and software updates

If you plan to change the firmware on your phone, then it will be easier to do this with a Qualcomm-based device. Smartphones with MediaTek processors do not receive as fast latest firmware, and this is due to the company’s policy regarding the source code.

In addition, developers of budget devices, which are mainly equipped with MediaTek processors, do not update the software themselves for a long time. Therefore, the lack of software updates is often associated with problems of phone manufacturers, and not the MediaTek representatives themselves. The company is trying to change this situation by offering its partners GMS Express - a more complete version of Android with several Google applications, instead of the standard AOSP build.

Project Treble from Google, in turn, also accelerated the receipt of software updates for devices based on both Qualcomm and MediaTek processors due to the fact that the dependence software Android hardware features have been reduced.

However, Qualcomm still leads in software updates and developer support.

Devices based on Qualcomm and MediaTek

MediaTek is very successful in creating processors for low-end and budget smartphones such as Nokia 1, Nokia 3 and 3.1, as well as Redmi 6 and 6A. New Helio A22 and P22 processors designed for low-cost and simple smartphones, smaller in size than their competitors from Qualcomm.

For budget models Qualcomm still offers the legacy Snapdragon 212 and Snapdragon 425 processors. Hopefully their new Snapdragon 429 and Snapdragon 439 will improve the picture.

Among the flagship devices, of course, devices based on Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 series processors (Snapdragon 835 and 845) dominate. Mediatek made a foray into the flagship processor market with last year's Helio X30 chipset. But so far this processor can only be found in Meizu Pro 7 Plus, while Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 is built into almost all top smartphones.

In mid-range phones you can find Qualcomm processors Snapdragon 400, 600 and 700 series, but also the developed MediaTek Helio P60 and MT6750. The latter are powered by Nokia 5.1 Plus, Realme 1, Oppo F9, LGQ7 and LG X Power 2, while the former are powered by Nokia 7 Plus, Xiaomi Mi A2, Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 and Realme 2 Pro. Therefore, it is difficult to name a leader here.

So who wins?

Users choose smartphones not only and not so much depending on what processor they use. Some people simply care about a productive device, while others want to get a high-quality camera, moisture protection and a 3.5 mm audio jack for their money.

If you buy a flagship, it will most likely be powered by a Qualcomm processor. In mid-range smartphones you can find both Helio P60 chipsets from MediaTek and Qualcomm Snapdragon 660. Both chipsets are approximately equal in performance, but the new 600 series processors from Qualcomm are likely to be more powerful than the Helio P60.

Among entry-level smartphones, MediaTek dominates with its Helio A22 and P22 chipsets. Not only are they smaller, but they also offer more modern connections such as Bluetooth 5.

It is also important that processors from MediaTek are cheaper than their competitors from Qualcomm. Therefore, smartphones based on them are often more affordable, although this does not mean that they are of worse quality.

If you use your phone only for calls, reading books and surfing the Internet, then the question of what processor is inside is not very important. This becomes important for those who intend to use the gadget beyond its capabilities, for example, for gamers. Let's take a closer look at the two leaders in the mobile processor market: Qualcomm and MediaTek.

What determines the performance of smartphones?

Subjectively, it is assessed as the speed of launching applications and rendering the interface, the absence of freezes, and quick response to control actions. Of course, processor parameters are important for all this, but we must not forget about other factors:

• amount of RAM,
• type of processor used,
• graphics adapter type.

The most high performance is achieved with the best balance of these three indicators.

Platforms for mobile devices

Most mobile devices are now released on the OS platform Android. It is a free operating system based on Linux kernel, promoted by Google, which is why many electronics manufacturers use it for their gadgets.

The second most popular platform is iOS, which is installed only on products Apple. Source code is closed, no other manufacturer can use this OS on their devices.

Processor manufacturers

Not many companies produce chipsets for mobile devices. You can compare some of them that occupy the top lines of popularity.

Qualcomm is an American company engaged in the development of wireless communication devices and chipsets for mobile devices. Today it is one of the leaders in this industry.

MediaTek is a Chinese engineering company designing microelectronics since 1997. It does not have its own production facilities, it is only engaged in development. Is the second main leader in this area. The headquarters is located in Taiwan, and branches are scattered throughout many countries around the world.

Samsung is a well-known South Korean corporation involved in many industries, from heavy industry to the entertainment industry. In the consumer market it is known primarily for its electronics and household appliances. Its electronics division also produces processors for mobile phones. They are mainly installed in domestically produced equipment.

Intel– the undisputed technological leader in the development of microprocessor technology. The company is best known for its chipsets for computers, servers and communications equipment, but mobile processors are also in its product line. This is, for example, the famous Atom brand.

Which processor to choose for a smartphone: from Qualcomm or MediaTek

Just a few years ago, MediaTek products were considered budget products, aimed exclusively at the lower price range. The quality was low, and the percentage of various failures was significantly higher than that of competitors. But in recent years this has become no longer the case. The company has learned to design chipsets that are not inferior in quality to Qualcomm products. However, prejudice against the Chinese developer still remains.

It makes sense to pay attention to the processor manufacturer when buying a smartphone or tablet if you are going to work with “heavy” applications, for example, mobile games.

For simple, uncomplicated applications, which are typical tasks for most users ( phone calls, banking programs, personal organizers, surfing the Internet, etc.) the difference is practically unimportant.

What do Qualcomm and MediaTek have in common?

The two industry leaders have some common features, if only because they operate in a narrow market segment. Both of them develop processors and chipsets for mobile gadgets, and at the same time do not have their own production facilities - third-party manufacturing companies directly manufacture equipment for them.

In the line of both companies there are products of all price categories, from the most budgetary to the most expensive. And yet they are all based on ARM architecture.

Pros and cons of Qualcomm processors

The Cortex processor core, which the company licensed from the British company ARM back in 2005, was redesigned for its own products. Currently, Qualcomm processors are produced under the Snapdragon brand. Its own microkernel gives the company a serious competitive advantage (for example, other developers are forced to use it).

Based on its own ARM architecture, Qualcomm engineers are constantly improving the technology. Latest generations processors under the Krait brand are manufactured using a 28-nanometer process technology. They include models with one, two and four cores.

Embedded coprocessors and communication modules often begin to support new communication technologies even before these standards are brought to market. mobile operators. Chipsets work with all network standards without exception.

The company has its own Adreno GPU, which is also constantly updated. In general, Qualcomm has a reputation as a company at the very forefront of technological progress.

The shortcomings of the American giant's products are usually associated with inflated prices. The constant pursuit of new products leads to the fact that products with Qualcomm chips are more expensive than their classmates and competitors.

In addition, the company has historically focused on the luxury segment of technology. The main attention is paid to expensive, top-end smartphones and tablets, while budget offers remain few. Perhaps this is the policy of the company's management.

Pros and cons of MediaTek processors

MediaTek processors have their own advantages and disadvantages.

The main one is the low price of devices built on chipsets from this developer. The company initially, from the time of its inception, focused on budget segment electronics. Even the flagships of product lines usually have prices at the level of average competitors.

The second advantage follows from the first, namely a wide range of products. At the bottom price category Almost the entire range of mobile electronics is based on the developments of MediaTek.

For its graphics subsystem, the company uses cores from the manufacturing company ARM. This basic solution, unlike the proprietary Adreno GPU that Qualcomm developed for itself. In such conditions, it is easier for software manufacturers to adapt their products. As a result, programs, and especially games, are less buggy and generate fewer errors. This also leads to a reduction in the overall price of the gadgets.

Of the minuses, the main one is probably the continuing reputation of a manufacturer of low-quality equipment. Due to the desire to save wherever possible, the company introduces technological innovations later than its competitors. This can partly explain the poor quality support for mobile application developers.

MediaTek does not develop the microkernel of its processors itself, like Qualcomm, but uses the basic Cortex solution. Such kernels are more difficult to optimize for their own solutions, and as a result they often lose in performance.

Processor frequency: which is better for a smartphone?

All mobile devices are designed with the expectation that they will run on batteries, which means that the issue of saving charge is very important. In the marketing promotion of gadgets, operating time on a single charge is important, and a device that requires charging as little as possible is more convenient for users.

This is taken into account when designing mobile electronics. All processors for smartphones and tablets can regulate their frequency: increase it at moments full load and vice versa, reduce during idle time to save battery. The specifications always indicate maximum frequency, on which the microcircuit can operate.

Modern mobile phones very rarely have a processor frequency below 1000 MHz. The upper limit today is only slightly beyond the value of 2.5 GHz.

• From 1000 to 1300 MHz – the lower limit, budget and most available models devices.
• From 1300 to 1700 MHz - the middle segment in both price and capabilities.
• From 1700 MHz and above – top models, flagships of their lines.

How many cores are needed for the device to function effectively?

It may seem that the more cores a processor has, the faster it is. In fact, this is not at all the case, and there is no direct relationship here. For example, MediaTek products can have up to 10 cores in one processor, but its overall performance is unlikely to be better than a 4-processor chip from Qualcomm.

Qualitative and thorough optimization of all components and blocks of the processor is decisive for performance. For example, Apple has solutions with only two cores, and at the same time they are in no way inferior to four- and even eight-core counterparts from competitors in the same class.

How will the 64-bit Mediatek MT6752 perform in comparison with the 64-bit Qualcomm Snapdragon 615?

At the time of writing main theme mobile market was the phrase “64-bit processor”. This term was pronounced on every corner like a mantra and was actively used by marketers to promote devices. A 64-bit processor is important step, but not only because of the 64-bit chip, but also others additional functions, which he brought to portable devices.

There are quite a number of 64-bit chips on the market today, but the most talked about are Mediatek MT6752 and Snapdragon 615 from Qualcomm. Both chips are used in many mid-range and high class, but which one is better?

This article compares two popular chinese phone with 64-bit chips. Qualcomm is on the side, and Mediatek’s honor is defended by the iOcean MT6752 Rock. Both phones were subjected to popular benchmark tests to find out which one delivers better performance. Before we get into the comparisons and results, let's take a look at the specs and features of both the processors.

The MT6752 has eight ARM Cortex-53 cores at 1.7 GHz and a Mali-T760 graphics processor, and it has support for 4G LTE. The processor is capable of supporting a camera up to 16 MP, and video recording is possible in 1080p resolution at 60 frames per second.

In turn, Snapdragon 615 introduces the industry's first 64-bit eight-core Cortex-A53 CPU. This chip has 4 cores at 1.7 GHz and 4 at 1 GHz. The Adreno 405 GPU can support screen resolutions of up to 2560x1600 pixels and cameras of up to 21 MP.

Both chips have their advantages: Mediatek seems more focused on productivity, and Snapdragon 615 on media entertainment.

Now we can take a closer look at the processors and their capabilities in the benchmarks and see which one will perform better.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Vellamo app

Vellamo started out as a mobile online tester and was later expanded into two main parts. The HTML5 part measures the performance of mobile devices while surfing the web, and the Metal part measures the single-core performance of the CPU subsystem of mobile processors.

Vellamo can evaluate scrolling and zooming, 3D graphics, video performance, processing speed internal memory, peak throughput and even more.

Based on this web test, performance appears to be about equal. This means that in scaling, loading, 3D graphics and video streaming, they will give customers the same efficiency.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Ludashi App

Ludashi Android version is a performance test app for phones and tablets. Using 8 tests, you can easily determine the performance of a mobile device and compare it with another.

Ultimately, the OPPO R5's results are far behind what the iOcean M6752 can offer. This means that the M6752's single-core performance is better than that of the OPPO R5, as the MT6752's results were almost double those of the Snapdragon.

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: gaming performance

Since both phones have a 1080p screen, their SoC should consume the same amount of power. In this test, the difference in SoC was determined using famous games.

The iOcean M6752 smartphone is equipped GPU Mali-T760. Output speed in home screen Games Need for Speed Normal, but the Mali GPU loses a little in overall graphical clarity.

In turn, OPPO R5 has an Adreno 405 graphics card, which performed better overall. While the smoothness and quality are excellent on both phones, the overall gaming experience on the Snapdragon 615 is as good as the MT6752.

NBA 2015 is a fresh game at that time, requiring a processor and graphics card good performance. The iOcean M6752 handled the game quite fluently, stuttering only a couple of times, while the Snapdragon 615 really disappointed in this game. The processor had a lot of difficulties with gameplay, and overall the image looked sluggish.

Other tests:

Mediatek MT6752 vs Snapdragon 615: Conclusion

While on paper both processors offer high standards and seem like they can handle anything, in fact the MT6752 in the iOcean MT6752 performed much better.

For most applications, each processor is good enough, but when it comes to anything complex, 64-bit Mediatek processor can “turn on the afterburner” and process heavy loads competently and smoothly. It seems to me that Oppo made a big mistake by using Snapdragon 615 instead of Mediatek MT6752 in their device. Not only because the MTK chip is more powerful, but also because it helps lower the price of the phone. This explains why iOcean sells its phone internationally for just over $200, while Oppo's price is closer to $500.

If you have dealt with any of these processors, please share your opinion in the comments.